Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Bedford, Cherrill  
dc.contributor.author
Galotta, Maria Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Oikonomou, Georgios  
dc.contributor.author
de Yaniz, María Guadalupe  
dc.contributor.author
Nardello, Matias  
dc.contributor.author
Sanchez Bruni, Sergio Fabian  
dc.contributor.author
Davies, Peers  
dc.date.available
2025-01-10T19:26:30Z  
dc.date.issued
2024-11  
dc.identifier.citation
Bedford, Cherrill; Galotta, Maria Laura; Oikonomou, Georgios; de Yaniz, María Guadalupe; Nardello, Matias; et al.; A mixed method approach to analysing patterns and drivers of antibiotic use and resistance in beef farms in Argentina; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 11; 11-2024; 1-20  
dc.identifier.issn
2297-1769  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/252287  
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance is a challenge to be faced by all livestocksectors; within beef farming, antibiotic use patterns vary by country andmanagement practices. Argentina is a country with high beef production &consumption but limited information surrounding antibiotic use. The aims ofthis project was to understand how antibiotics are being used across the beefindustry in Argentina and exploring drivers of usage.Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data was collected by: A survey of breedingand feedlot farms including antibiotic use (from purchase data); a detailedanalysis of two feedlot farms’ therapeutic antibiotic use records; a survey ofvets’ views on certain antibiotic practices; and a focus group of farmers andvets focusing on wider influences affecting decision making. Antibiotic use datawas calculated using mg/population corrected unit (PCU) (ESVAC) and thematicanalysis was used to identify drivers of antibiotic use among participants.Results: The median use across 17 farms that supplied purchase data was 76.52 mg/kg PCU (ESVAC; IQR  =  36.81  mg/kg PCU [ESVAC]). The detailed farm recordsshowed that the largest reason for treatment was group treatments (72.92% oftreatments) followed by treatment for respiratory disease (12.75% of treatments).Macrolides accounted for 76.37% of treatments. Nearly half of farms used routineprophylactic treatment for arriving animals (n  =  7/18). The use of quarantine and ‘sickpens’ were seen as important by surveyed vets with antibiotic prophylaxis and in-feedantibiotics seen as contributors to antibiotic resistance. The focus group highlightedthe influence of the economic and political landscape on husbandry practices andthe responsibility the farming sector had towards antibiotic stewardship.Discussion: Overall, Argentine beef feedlots resemble North American beef feedlotsin terms of antibiotic practices but with considerably lower usage, with in-feedmonensin representing a large proportion of total ABU. The adaptation periodpresents a challenge to animal health; antibiotics are administered a prophylaxis,metaphylactic and individual treatments depending on farm management practices.Further research into internationally comparable measures of ABU and detailedcost-benefit analysis of practical, on-farm interventions are needed to aid improvedantimicrobial stewardship in livestock systems globally.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ANTIMICROBIALS  
dc.subject
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE  
dc.subject
BEEF FARMS  
dc.subject
FEEDLOTS  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
A mixed method approach to analysing patterns and drivers of antibiotic use and resistance in beef farms in Argentina  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2025-01-10T13:37:51Z  
dc.journal.volume
11  
dc.journal.pagination
1-20  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.journal.ciudad
Lausana  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bedford, Cherrill. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Galotta, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Oikonomou, Georgios. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: de Yaniz, María Guadalupe. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nardello, Matias. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sanchez Bruni, Sergio Fabian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Davies, Peers. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido  
dc.journal.title
Frontiers in Veterinary Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1454032/full  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1454032