Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris  
dc.date.available
2024-09-18T11:16:23Z  
dc.date.issued
2005-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-39  
dc.identifier.issn
0039-7857  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504  
dc.description.abstract
In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Fred Dretske  
dc.subject
Theory of Shannon  
dc.subject
Information  
dc.subject
Knowledge  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-09-13T11:38:08Z  
dc.journal.volume
144  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
23-39  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Dordrecht  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Synthese (Dordrecht)  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0