Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Duval, Matias Ezequiel  
dc.contributor.author
Galantini, Juan Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
Iglesias, Julio Osvaldo  
dc.contributor.author
Canelo, Silvia  
dc.contributor.author
Martinez, Juan Manuel  
dc.contributor.author
Wall, Luis Gabriel  
dc.date.available
2017-09-11T22:15:33Z  
dc.date.issued
2013-04  
dc.identifier.citation
Duval, Matias Ezequiel; Galantini, Juan Alberto; Iglesias, Julio Osvaldo; Canelo, Silvia; Martinez, Juan Manuel; et al.; Analysis of organic fractions as indicators of soil quality under natural and cultivated systems; Elsevier; Soil & Tillage Research; 131; 4-2013; 11-19  
dc.identifier.issn
0167-1987  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/23962  
dc.description.abstract
Soil organic matter (SOM) or carbon (SOC) is the most important component of the soil and it is composed of fractions with different lability. Particulate organic carbon (POC) and carbohydrates (CH), among others, are the most sensitive to changes in crops and soil management practices. The purpose of this study was to analyze different soil parameters aimed for the evaluation of management practices effects under widely different soil and climatic conditions. Soils were located along a West–East transect in the most productive region of the Argentinean pampas: [West] Bengolea and Monte Buey (Córdoba), Pergamino (Buenos Aires) and Viale (Entre Rios) [East]. Three treatments were defined according to land use: “Good agricultural practices” (GAP): sustainable agricultural management under no-till; “Poor agricultural practices” (PAP): non-sustainable agricultural management under no-till; “Natural environment” (NE): rangelands long as reference situation. Samples were taken at 0–10 and 10–20 cm depths. SOC was determined in different particle size fractions: 105–2000 μm (coarse particulate organic carbon, POCc), 53–105 μm (fine particulate organic carbon, POCf), and 53 μm (mineral-associated organic carbon, MOC). Total (CHt) and soluble (CHs) carbohydrate contents were also determined. The SOC level in NE was decreasing from the East (27.3 g kg−1 in Viale) to the West (13.3 g kg−1 in Bengolea), following the rainfall and texture gradient among sites. The POCc/SOC and POCc + POCf/SOC ratios in the NE showed differences among sites, suggesting different dynamic depending on the environmental characteristics at the different locations. The SOC levels in the upper layer of agricultural soils were 16–44% lower than natural ones. Carbon stocks were estimated for an equivalent mass of soil (950 and 2350 Mg ha−1) in order to consider differences in bulk densities among different treatments. Mean values were significantly different (p < 0.001) for the different management practices: NE (26.6 Mg ha−1) > GAP (20.1 Mg ha−1) > PAP (16.3 Mg ha−1). In general, labile organic fractions showed differential sensitivity. Fractions with an intermediate dynamic, as POCf (53–100 μm) and CHt, seem to be better indicators to detect the short- and medium-term management effects than more dynamic fractions.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Soil Organic Fractions  
dc.subject
No Tillage  
dc.subject
Soil Quality  
dc.subject
Good Agricultural Practices  
dc.subject.classification
Oceanografía, Hidrología, Recursos Hídricos  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Analysis of organic fractions as indicators of soil quality under natural and cultivated systems  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-09-08T20:22:52Z  
dc.journal.volume
131  
dc.journal.pagination
11-19  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Ámsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Duval, Matias Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Galantini, Juan Alberto. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Iglesias, Julio Osvaldo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Canelo, Silvia. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martinez, Juan Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Wall, Luis Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología. Laboratorio de Investigación en Interacciones Biológicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Soil & Tillage Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198713000585  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.03.001