Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2024-07-04T15:42:09Z
dc.date.issued
2023-07
dc.identifier.citation
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-179
dc.identifier.issn
1220-5400
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110
dc.description.abstract
There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
QUANTUM THEORIES
dc.subject
FORMULATIONS
dc.subject
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
dc.subject
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2024-06-24T09:53:37Z
dc.identifier.eissn
2821-4242
dc.journal.volume
67
dc.journal.number
2
dc.journal.pagination
153-179
dc.journal.pais
Rumania
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Bucaresti
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Revue Roumaine de Philosophie
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/page.php?153
Archivos asociados