Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Irazola, Vilma  
dc.contributor.author
Santero, Marilina  
dc.contributor.author
Sanchez, Mario  
dc.contributor.author
Tristao, Ignez  
dc.contributor.author
Ruiz, Juan Ignacio  
dc.contributor.author
Spira, Cintia  
dc.contributor.author
Ismael, Julia  
dc.contributor.author
Cavallo, Ana Soledad  
dc.contributor.author
Gutierrez, Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Mazzaresi, Yanina  
dc.contributor.author
Nadal, Ana Maria  
dc.contributor.author
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel  
dc.date.available
2024-06-10T13:17:53Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Open Quality; 12; 2; 6-2023; 1-8  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/237640  
dc.description.abstract
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
BMJ Publishing Group  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Early Detection of Cancer  
dc.subject
Colorectal Neoplasms  
dc.subject
Cluster trials  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias de la Salud  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD  
dc.title
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-06-06T10:42:01Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2399-6641  
dc.journal.volume
12  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
1-8  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Irazola, Vilma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Santero, Marilina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sanchez, Mario. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tristao, Ignez. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ruiz, Juan Ignacio. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Spira, Cintia. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ismael, Julia. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cavallo, Ana Soledad. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mazzaresi, Yanina. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nadal, Ana Maria. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
BMJ Open Quality  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002158  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158