Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Irazola, Vilma
dc.contributor.author
Santero, Marilina
dc.contributor.author
Sanchez, Mario
dc.contributor.author
Tristao, Ignez
dc.contributor.author
Ruiz, Juan Ignacio
dc.contributor.author
Spira, Cintia
dc.contributor.author
Ismael, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Cavallo, Ana Soledad
dc.contributor.author
Gutierrez, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Mazzaresi, Yanina
dc.contributor.author
Nadal, Ana Maria
dc.contributor.author
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
dc.date.available
2024-06-10T13:17:53Z
dc.date.issued
2023-06
dc.identifier.citation
Irazola, Vilma; Santero, Marilina; Sanchez, Mario; Tristao, Ignez; Ruiz, Juan Ignacio; et al.; Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial; BMJ Publishing Group; BMJ Open Quality; 12; 2; 6-2023; 1-8
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/237640
dc.description.abstract
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country.Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers andcatalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy.Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups.Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Early Detection of Cancer
dc.subject
Colorectal Neoplasms
dc.subject
Cluster trials
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias de la Salud
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
dc.title
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2024-06-06T10:42:01Z
dc.identifier.eissn
2399-6641
dc.journal.volume
12
dc.journal.number
2
dc.journal.pagination
1-8
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Irazola, Vilma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Santero, Marilina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sanchez, Mario. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tristao, Ignez. Inter-American Development Bank; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ruiz, Juan Ignacio. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Spira, Cintia. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ismael, Julia. Ministerio de Salud. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cavallo, Ana Soledad. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gutierrez, Laura. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mazzaresi, Yanina. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nadal, Ana Maria. Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ministerio de Salud Desarrollo Social y Deportes.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.journal.title
BMJ Open Quality
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/12/2/e002158
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158
Archivos asociados