Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Peri, Pablo Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José  
dc.contributor.author
Dick, Jan  
dc.contributor.author
Turkelboom, Francis  
dc.contributor.author
Woods, Helen  
dc.contributor.author
Iniesta Arandia, Irene  
dc.contributor.author
Primmer, Eeva  
dc.contributor.author
Saarela, Sanna Riikka  
dc.contributor.author
Bezák, Peter  
dc.contributor.author
Leone, Michael  
dc.contributor.author
Verheyden, Wim  
dc.contributor.author
Kelemen, Eszter  
dc.contributor.author
Antunes, Paula  
dc.contributor.author
Baró, Francesc  
dc.contributor.author
Garcia Blanco, Gemma  
dc.contributor.author
Montenegro Lapola, David  
dc.contributor.author
Luque, Sandra Silvia  
dc.contributor.author
Preda, Elena  
dc.contributor.author
Grizzetti, Bruna  
dc.contributor.author
Gleiciani Bürger, Patrício Roberto  
dc.contributor.author
Priess, Joerg  
dc.contributor.author
Clemente, Pedro  
dc.contributor.author
Fernandes, João  
dc.contributor.author
Ferraz, Diogo  
dc.contributor.author
Fongar, Claudia  
dc.contributor.author
García Llorente, Marina  
dc.contributor.author
Gundersen, Vegard  
dc.contributor.author
Palomo, Ignacio  
dc.contributor.author
Rusch,Graciela  
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Alison  
dc.date.available
2024-04-08T12:20:46Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-04  
dc.identifier.citation
Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Dick, Jan; Turkelboom, Francis; Woods, Helen; et al.; Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies; Elsevier; Ecosystem Services; 29; C; 4-2018; 552-565  
dc.identifier.issn
2212-0416  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/232286  
dc.description.abstract
The ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners’ perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Stakeholder perceptions  
dc.subject
Evaluation Ecosystem services  
dc.subject
Place-based implementation  
dc.subject
Operationalisation  
dc.subject.classification
Conservación de la Biodiversidad  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-10-17T14:04:29Z  
dc.journal.volume
29  
dc.journal.number
C  
dc.journal.pagination
552-565  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Cruz. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Santa Cruz; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dick, Jan. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Woods, Helen. Centre For Ecology And Hydrology; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Iniesta Arandia, Irene. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Primmer, Eeva. Finnish Environment Institute Helsinki; Finlandia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Saarela, Sanna Riikka. Finnish Environment Institute Helsinki; Finlandia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bezák, Peter. Slovak Academy of Sciences. Institute of Botany; Eslovaquia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Leone, Michael. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Verheyden, Wim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kelemen, Eszter. Department of Decision Sciences, Corvinus University of Budapest; Hungría  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Antunes, Paula. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Portugal  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Garcia Blanco, Gemma. Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Montenegro Lapola, David. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho. Faculdade de Engenharia; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Luque, Sandra Silvia. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest; Rumania  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Grizzetti, Bruna. European Commission – Joint Research Centre ; Italia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gleiciani Bürger, Patrício Roberto. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho. Faculdade de Engenharia; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Priess, Joerg. Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig; Alemania  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Clemente, Pedro. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Portugal  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fernandes, João. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Portugal  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ferraz, Diogo. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Portugal  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fongar, Claudia. Norwegian University of Life Sciences; Noruega  
dc.description.fil
Fil: García Llorente, Marina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gundersen, Vegard. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research; Noruega  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. Centro Vasco para el Cambio Climático ; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rusch,Graciela. Centro Vasco para el Cambio Climático ; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Smith, Alison. Centro Vasco para el Cambio Climático ; España  
dc.journal.title
Ecosystem Services  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041616304661