Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Martinuzzi, Sebastián  
dc.contributor.author
Olah, Ashley M.  
dc.contributor.author
Rivera, Luis Osvaldo  
dc.contributor.author
Politi, Natalia  
dc.contributor.author
Silveira, Eduarda M. O.  
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José  
dc.contributor.author
Rosas, Yamina Micaela  
dc.contributor.author
Lizarraga, Leonidas  
dc.contributor.author
Názaro, María Paula  
dc.contributor.author
Bardavid, Sofia  
dc.contributor.author
Radeloff, Volker  
dc.contributor.author
Pidgeon, Anna Michle  
dc.date.available
2024-03-13T11:01:24Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-10  
dc.identifier.citation
Martinuzzi, Sebastián; Olah, Ashley M.; Rivera, Luis Osvaldo; Politi, Natalia; Silveira, Eduarda M. O.; et al.; Closing the research-implementation gap: Integrating species and human footprint data into Argentina's forest planning; Elsevier; Biological Conservation; 286; 10-2023; 1-12  
dc.identifier.issn
0006-3207  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/230273  
dc.description.abstract
Closing the research-implementation gap is key for advancing biodiversity conservation. One approach is to generate ecologically relevant spatial datasets that integrate easily with existing management plans. Our goal was to identify priority forest conservation areas in Argentina by combining species distributions, human footprint data, and existing forest zoning. We: (i) mapped potential habitat distributions of 70 plant and animal species associated with forests, and of recognized social and ecological importance, (ii) combined the species distributions with human footprint data to identify priority conservation areas, and (iii) evaluated the juxtaposition of our priority conservation areas with current forest management zones. We found that priority conservation areas (i.e., high number of species and low human footprint) are poorly protected by the current zoning scheme. While the Andean-Patagonian region had a substantial portion (57 %) of priority conservation areas in high protection zones, in four other forest regions we evaluated, only 16–37 % of priority areas had high protection levels. Of great concern are the Chaco and Espinal regions, where 36 % and 39 %, respectively, of priority conservation areas are in low protection zones, where conversion to other uses (row crops, livestock) is allowed. Our results provide new spatial information to managers and conservationists highlighting where current forest zoning performs well, and where it may warrant re-evaluation. Overall, our study highlights the value of integrating species distributions and human footprint maps into existing land use plans to guide conservation efforts in data-poor countries, and is an example of a strategy for closing the research-implementation gap.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Conservation planning  
dc.subject
GIS  
dc.subject
Land-use planning  
dc.subject
Regional biodiversity conservation  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Naturales y Exactas  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Naturales y Exactas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Closing the research-implementation gap: Integrating species and human footprint data into Argentina's forest planning  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-03-12T10:58:24Z  
dc.journal.volume
286  
dc.journal.pagination
1-12  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martinuzzi, Sebastián. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Olah, Ashley M.. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rivera, Luis Osvaldo. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Politi, Natalia. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Silveira, Eduarda M. O.. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lizarraga, Leonidas. Administración de Parques Nacionales; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Názaro, María Paula. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bardavid, Sofia. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Radeloff, Volker. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pidgeon, Anna Michle. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Biological Conservation  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320723003580  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110257