Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Loewe Muñoz, VerónicA  
dc.contributor.author
Delard, Claudia  
dc.contributor.author
del Río, Rodrigo  
dc.contributor.author
Barrales, Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Balzarini, Monica Graciela  
dc.date.available
2024-02-14T12:14:25Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Loewe Muñoz, VerónicA; Delard, Claudia; del Río, Rodrigo; Barrales, Luis; Balzarini, Monica Graciela; Mixed Castanea sativa plantations including arboreal companion species enhance chestnut growth and high-quality timber production; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 529; 120742; 2-2023; 1-9  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-1127  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226773  
dc.description.abstract
Context: Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) is an important tree species for its timber, which is widely used for multiple purposes, including the veneer industry. The species has an interesting productive potential in Chile and requires specific management strategies to produce valuable, high-quality logs. Although mixed plantations including companion species usually enhance timber quality of several trees, the performance of chestnut under different associations is not well known. Aims: The objective of this study was to assess growth, survival, health, and timber quality of chestnut trees in several plantation types, including monoculture and mixtures with other companion trees and/or shrub. Methods: Growth and survival measurements were taken periodically in pure chestnut and mixed plantations established in southern Chile for a 20-year period after planting. The mixed plantations tested were: a main forest species mixture (Castanea sativa Mill., Quercus rubra L., Quercus robur L. and Prunus avium L.); three mixtures including main forest species plus one arboreal companion species (Alnus glutinosa L., Gevuina avellana Mol. or Embothrium coccineum J.R. Forst. & G. Forst.); one including main forest species plus one shrub nurse species (Fabiana imbricata Ruiz & Pav.); and three mixtures including one of the arboreal companion species and the shrub. Timber quality variables were assessed at age 20, and health status was recorded at ages 7 and 20 in all plantations. Growth variables were analyzed using linear mixed models to assess plantation effect over time. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log Rank Test were used to compare chestnut tree survival among plantation types. Quality timber variables were analyzed with a χ2 test. Results: Chestnut trees associated with arboreal main species (P. avium, Q. rubra, Q. robur) (Mix1) showed the best performance, with 10.1 % and 8.3 % higher height than average values of the other mixtures and the monoculture, respectively, and 19.1 % and 12.8 % higher diameter growth than across plantation types and monoculture average values, respectively. Mix1 had the highest average volume per tree (0.34 m− 3 ), at least 30 % higher than the average volume of pure and other mixed plantations. This mixture including only main species also exhibited the highest percentage of trees with high trunk length values of all plantation types. No pest or diseases were recorded on chestnut trees, and survival was high in all plantation types. Conclusion: The impact of mixed plantations on growth and timber quality was evidenced at age 20. In particular, the association including arboreal companion species enhanced chestnut tree performance.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ASSOCIATIONS  
dc.subject
BROADLEAVED SPECIES  
dc.subject
MONOCULTURE  
dc.subject
NOBLE WOOD  
dc.subject
NURSE SPECIES  
dc.subject.classification
Silvicultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Mixed Castanea sativa plantations including arboreal companion species enhance chestnut growth and high-quality timber production  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-02-09T11:18:39Z  
dc.journal.volume
529  
dc.journal.number
120742  
dc.journal.pagination
1-9  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Loewe Muñoz, VerónicA. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Delard, Claudia. Instituto Forest Biblioteca; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: del Río, Rodrigo. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Barrales, Luis. Chilean Forest Institute (infor). Los Ríos Office; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Balzarini, Monica Graciela. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Forest Ecology and Management  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120742  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112722007368