Artículo
Comparison of endothelial shear stress between ultrathin strut Bioresorbable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent vs Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent post-stent implantation: An optical coherence tomography substudy from BIOFLOW II
Beyene, Solomon; Tufaro, Vincenzo; Garg, Mohil; Gkargkoulas, Fotis; Calderon, Andrea Teira; Safi, Hannah; Waksman, Ron; Windecker, Stephan; Torii, Ryo; Melaku, Gebremedhin D.; Bulant, Carlos Alberto
; Bourantas, Christos V.; Blanco, Pablo Javier; Garcia, Hector Mario
Fecha de publicación:
11/2023
Editorial:
Elsevier
Revista:
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
ISSN:
1553-8389
e-ISSN:
1878-0938
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Background: Recent clinical data indicate a different performance of biodegradable polymer (BP)-drug eluting stent (DES) compared to durable polymer (DP)-DES. Whether this can be explained by a beneficial impact of BP-DES stent design on the local hemodynamic forces distribution remains unclear. Objectives: To compare endothelial shear stress (ESS) distribution after implantation of ultrathin (us) BP-DES and DP-DES and examine the association between ESS and neointimal thickness (NIT) distribution in the two devices at 9 months follow up. Methods and results: We retrospectively identified patients from the BIOFLOW II trial that had undergone OCT imaging. OCT data were utilized to reconstruct the surface of the stented segment at baseline and 9 months follow-up, simulate blood flow, and measure ESS and NIT in the stented segment. The patients were divided into 3 groups depending on whether DP-DES (N = 8, n = 56,160 sectors), BP-DES with a stent diameter of >3 mm (strut thickness of 80 μm, N = 6, n = 36,504 sectors), or BP-DES with a stent diameter of ≤3 mm (strut thickness of 60 μm, N = 8, n = 50,040 sectors) were used for treatment. The ESS, and NIT distribution and the association of these two variables were estimated and compared among the 3 groups. Results: In the DP-DES group mean NIT was 0.18 ± 0.17 mm and ESS 1.68 ± 1.66 Pa; for the BP-DES ≤3 mm group the NIT was 0.17 ± 0.11 mm and ESS 1.49 ± 1.24 Pa and for the BP-DES >3 mm group 0.20 ± 0.23 mm and 1.42 ± 1.24 Pa respectively (p < 0.001 for both NIT and ESS comparisons across groups). A negative correlation between NIT and baseline ESS was found, the correlation coefficient for all the stented segments was −0.33, p < 0.001. Conclusion: In this OCT sub-study of the BIOFLOW II trial, the NIT was statistically different between groups of patients treated with BP-DES and DP-DES. In addition, regions of low ESS were associated with increased NIT in all studied devices.
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(CCT - TANDIL)
Articulos de CTRO CIENTIFICO TECNOLOGICO CONICET - TANDIL
Articulos de CTRO CIENTIFICO TECNOLOGICO CONICET - TANDIL
Citación
Beyene, Solomon; Tufaro, Vincenzo; Garg, Mohil; Gkargkoulas, Fotis; Calderon, Andrea Teira; et al.; Comparison of endothelial shear stress between ultrathin strut Bioresorbable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent vs Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent post-stent implantation: An optical coherence tomography substudy from BIOFLOW II; Elsevier; Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine; 11-2023; 1-9
Compartir
Altmétricas
Items relacionados
Mostrando titulos relacionados por título, autor y tema.
-
Fernandez, Alejandro; Mele, Esteban; Renou, Sandra Judith; Olmedo, Daniel Gustavo ; Berrocal, Daniel; Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge (Argentine Society of Cardiology, 2018-04-30)
-
Rodriguez, Alfredo E.; Rodriguez Granillo, Gaston Alfredo ; Antoniucci, David; Mieres, Juan; Fernandez Pereira, Carlos; Rodriguez Granillo, Gaston Alfredo ; Santaera, Omar; Rubilar, Bibiana; Palacios, Igor F.; Serruys, Patrick W. (Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2012-09)
-
Navarro, Lucila ; Luna, Julio Alberto ; Rintoul, Ignacio (World Scientific, 2016-05)