Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Cantón, Candela  
dc.contributor.author
Ceballos, Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Dominguez, Maria Paula  
dc.contributor.author
Cantón, Lucila  
dc.contributor.author
Buffarini, Miguel  
dc.contributor.author
Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo  
dc.contributor.author
Alvarez, Luis Ignacio  
dc.date.available
2023-12-26T17:37:06Z  
dc.date.issued
2022  
dc.identifier.citation
Combined anthelmintic treatments to control resistant nematodes in cattle: pharmacokinetic and field efficacy evaluations; 67º Annual Meeting American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists; Snowbird; Estados Unidos; 2022; 106-106  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/221440  
dc.description.abstract
In an attempt to minimize therapeutic failures following anthelmintic treatments, the combined use of nematodicidal compounds with different mechanisms of action has been proposed. A pharmaco-parasitological assessment of different nematodicidal combinations was performed on two commercial cattle farms in Argentina(A and B). Two different nematodicidal combinations of a macrocyclic lactone(ML) and a benzimidazole(BZD) anthelmintics were evaluated in a multi-resistant field scenario. Ivermectin(IVM)+ricobendazole(RBZ) both given subcutaneously and abamectin(ABA)+oxfendazole(OXF) both given orally were assessed in calves naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both chemical families. The observed pharmacokinetic(PK) data demonstrated that the co-administration of two anthelmintics did not modify the plasma PK disposition of either drug in cattle. In fact, no adverse PK interactions were observed after each combined treatment, with no differences in PK parameters(P>0.05) observed between the single-drug and the combined-based strategies. While the observed initial efficacies were 40%(IVM), 64%(RBZ) and 90%(IVM+RBZ)(Farm A), the egg reductions were 54%(IVM), 84%(RBZ) and 98%(IVM-RBZ)(Farm B). After repeated annual(over 5 years) use of the same combination on both farms, the efficacy of the combined treatment decreased to 83% on Farm A. In contrast, the efficacy of the combination IVM-RBZ remained at 93% efficacy in Farm B .To optimize drug activity against those highly bi-resistant nematode population, oral combined treatments were assayed. Efficacies of ABA alone, OXF alone and the co-administration ABA+OXF were 62%, 88% and 99%, respectively(Farm A) and, 92%, 95% and 98%, respectively(Farm B).The Haemonchus spp. were resistant to ABA, the Ostertagia spp. were resistant to OXF and both anthelmintics failed to control the Cooperia spp.However, the combination ABA+OXF was the only treatment that achieved 99-100% efficacy against all genera, indicating the presence of an additive effect. Overall, anthelmintic combinations can be useful to optimize the control of resistant gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.However, its rational use should be strongly supported by pre-treatment diagnosis and considering the epidemiological situation of each individual farm.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Cattle  
dc.subject
Resistant nematodes  
dc.subject
Anthelmintic combinations  
dc.subject
Efficacy  
dc.subject
Pharmacokinetics  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Combined anthelmintic treatments to control resistant nematodes in cattle: pharmacokinetic and field efficacy evaluations  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/documento de conferencia  
dc.date.updated
2023-11-23T13:53:03Z  
dc.journal.pagination
106-106  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Snowbird  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cantón, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ceballos, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dominguez, Maria Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cantón, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Buffarini, Miguel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Norte. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria General Villegas.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aavp.org/documents/2022/07/aavp-2022-annual-meeting-proceedings.pdf/  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.conicet.rol
Autor  
dc.coverage
Internacional  
dc.type.subtype
Reunión  
dc.description.nombreEvento
67º Annual Meeting American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists  
dc.date.evento
2022-06-25  
dc.description.ciudadEvento
Snowbird  
dc.description.paisEvento
Estados Unidos  
dc.type.publicacion
Book  
dc.description.institucionOrganizadora
American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists  
dc.source.libro
67º Annual Meeting American of the American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists  
dc.source.revista
Revista del congreso  
dc.date.eventoHasta
2022-06-28  
dc.type
Reunión