Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cantón, Candela
dc.contributor.author
Ceballos, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Dominguez, Maria Paula
dc.contributor.author
Cantón, Lucila
dc.contributor.author
Buffarini, Miguel
dc.contributor.author
Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo
dc.contributor.author
Alvarez, Luis Ignacio
dc.date.available
2023-12-26T17:37:06Z
dc.date.issued
2022
dc.identifier.citation
Combined anthelmintic treatments to control resistant nematodes in cattle: pharmacokinetic and field efficacy evaluations; 67º Annual Meeting American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists; Snowbird; Estados Unidos; 2022; 106-106
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/221440
dc.description.abstract
In an attempt to minimize therapeutic failures following anthelmintic treatments, the combined use of nematodicidal compounds with different mechanisms of action has been proposed. A pharmaco-parasitological assessment of different nematodicidal combinations was performed on two commercial cattle farms in Argentina(A and B). Two different nematodicidal combinations of a macrocyclic lactone(ML) and a benzimidazole(BZD) anthelmintics were evaluated in a multi-resistant field scenario. Ivermectin(IVM)+ricobendazole(RBZ) both given subcutaneously and abamectin(ABA)+oxfendazole(OXF) both given orally were assessed in calves naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to both chemical families. The observed pharmacokinetic(PK) data demonstrated that the co-administration of two anthelmintics did not modify the plasma PK disposition of either drug in cattle. In fact, no adverse PK interactions were observed after each combined treatment, with no differences in PK parameters(P>0.05) observed between the single-drug and the combined-based strategies. While the observed initial efficacies were 40%(IVM), 64%(RBZ) and 90%(IVM+RBZ)(Farm A), the egg reductions were 54%(IVM), 84%(RBZ) and 98%(IVM-RBZ)(Farm B). After repeated annual(over 5 years) use of the same combination on both farms, the efficacy of the combined treatment decreased to 83% on Farm A. In contrast, the efficacy of the combination IVM-RBZ remained at 93% efficacy in Farm B .To optimize drug activity against those highly bi-resistant nematode population, oral combined treatments were assayed. Efficacies of ABA alone, OXF alone and the co-administration ABA+OXF were 62%, 88% and 99%, respectively(Farm A) and, 92%, 95% and 98%, respectively(Farm B).The Haemonchus spp. were resistant to ABA, the Ostertagia spp. were resistant to OXF and both anthelmintics failed to control the Cooperia spp.However, the combination ABA+OXF was the only treatment that achieved 99-100% efficacy against all genera, indicating the presence of an additive effect. Overall, anthelmintic combinations can be useful to optimize the control of resistant gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.However, its rational use should be strongly supported by pre-treatment diagnosis and considering the epidemiological situation of each individual farm.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Cattle
dc.subject
Resistant nematodes
dc.subject
Anthelmintic combinations
dc.subject
Efficacy
dc.subject
Pharmacokinetics
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Combined anthelmintic treatments to control resistant nematodes in cattle: pharmacokinetic and field efficacy evaluations
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/documento de conferencia
dc.date.updated
2023-11-23T13:53:03Z
dc.journal.pagination
106-106
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.journal.ciudad
Snowbird
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cantón, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ceballos, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dominguez, Maria Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cantón, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Buffarini, Miguel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Norte. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria General Villegas.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aavp.org/documents/2022/07/aavp-2022-annual-meeting-proceedings.pdf/
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.conicet.rol
Autor
dc.coverage
Internacional
dc.type.subtype
Reunión
dc.description.nombreEvento
67º Annual Meeting American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists
dc.date.evento
2022-06-25
dc.description.ciudadEvento
Snowbird
dc.description.paisEvento
Estados Unidos
dc.type.publicacion
Book
dc.description.institucionOrganizadora
American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists
dc.source.libro
67º Annual Meeting American of the American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists
dc.source.revista
Revista del congreso
dc.date.eventoHasta
2022-06-28
dc.type
Reunión
Archivos asociados