Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Soria, María Cecilia

dc.contributor.author
Soria, Mario Alberto

dc.contributor.author
Bueno, Dante Javier

dc.date.available
2017-08-10T19:35:56Z
dc.date.issued
2013-01
dc.identifier.citation
Soria, María Cecilia; Soria, Mario Alberto; Bueno, Dante Javier; A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water; Poultry Science Association; Poultry Science; 92; 1; 1-2013; 225-232
dc.identifier.issn
0032-5791
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22128
dc.description.abstract
The present work compared 2 culture methods and PCR assays for motile and nonmotile Salmonella detection using artificially contaminated poultry drinking water. The specificity was 1 for all methods studied. The accuracy and sensitivity were 1 for all motile strains, whereas these parameters were between 0 and 0.7 for nonmotile Salmonella strains. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1 for all motile Salmonella strains in the 3 methods used. Nonmotile Salmonella strains showed a positive predictive value of 1 in the PCR method. However, the positive predictive value was indeterminate in the tetrathionate (TT) methods for both strains tested and in the modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method for Salmonella Pullorum. On the other hand, the negative predictive value was between 0.20 and 0.43 for the 3 methods. The detection level of motile strains was 4 to 7 cfu/25 mL for all methods. Nonmotile Salmonella strains could not be detected in the TT method, whereas only Salmonella Gallinarum could be recovered from 1.1 × 101 cfu/25 mL in the MSRV method. In relation to the molecular methods, PCR could detect these strains from 1.1 × 104 cfu/25 mL. Extending incubation time of the enrichment medium to 6 d in the TT method did not improve the isolation rates. In general, all selective plating media did not show any statistical differences in the parameters of performance studied. The kappa coefficient showed that there was an excellent agreement between the 3 methods for motile strains. For nonmotile strains, the agreement was poor between the MSRV and the PCR; there was no agreement when the TT method was compared with the MSRV and the PCR methods. The difference in detection levels obtained with the methods used for motile and nonmotile Salmonella strains and the difficulty in detecting these last strains represents a potential problem when a poultry water sample is considered negative for the presence of Salmonella.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Poultry Science Association

dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Salmonella
dc.subject
Water
dc.subject
Culture Method
dc.subject
Polymerase Chain Reaction
dc.subject.classification
Bioquímica y Biología Molecular

dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas

dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS

dc.title
A comparative study of culture methods and PCR assay for Salmonella detection in poultry drinking water
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2017-08-07T16:23:07Z
dc.journal.volume
92
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
225-232
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos

dc.journal.ciudad
Champaign
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soria, Mario Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bueno, Dante Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Poultry Science

dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02254
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119398475
Archivos asociados