Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín  
dc.contributor.author
Manubens, Rocío Tamara  
dc.contributor.author
Areas, Malenka Alejandra  
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Álvarez, Javier  
dc.contributor.author
Meglio, Manuel  
dc.contributor.author
Babl, Anna  
dc.contributor.author
Juan, Santiago  
dc.contributor.author
Ronchi, Agnese  
dc.contributor.author
Muiños, Roberto Daniel  
dc.contributor.author
Roussos, Andres Jorge  
dc.contributor.author
Lutz, Wolfgang  
dc.contributor.author
Grosse Holtforth, Martin  
dc.date.available
2023-12-11T15:31:14Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Manubens, Rocío Tamara; Areas, Malenka Alejandra; Fernández Álvarez, Javier; Meglio, Manuel; et al.; Implementation of a routine outcome monitoring and feedback system for psychotherapy in Argentina: A pilot study; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Psychology; 13; 5; 1-2023; 1-10  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219811  
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) has emerged as a strong candidate to improve psychotherapy processes and outcome. However, its use and implementation are greatly understudied in Latin-America. Therefore, the aim of the present pilot study conducted in Argentina was to implement a ROM and feedback system grounded on a psychometrically sound instrument to measure session by session outcome in psychotherapy. Methods: The sample consisted of 40 patients and 13 therapists. At baseline, the patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and they also completed the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-11 before each of the first five sessions. To estimate patient change during the first sessions, we conducted a quantitative analysis using Hierarchical Linear Models. Furthermore, we conducted a qualitative analysis using Consensual Qualitative Research to analyze therapist perception regarding the ROM and feedback system. Results: Results showed a significant reduction in patients’ symptomatic severity during the first five sessions. Additionally, baseline depression significantly predicted the estimated severity at the end of the fifth session. Feedback was given to the therapists after the first four sessions based on these analyses. With regard to the perception of the feedback system, clinicians underlined its usefulness and user-friendly nature. They also mentioned that there was a match between the information provided and their clinical judgment. Furthermore, they provided suggestions to enhance the system that was incorporated in a new and improved version. Discussion: Limitations and clinical implications are discussed.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS  
dc.subject
FEEDBACK  
dc.subject
MONITORING  
dc.subject
PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME  
dc.subject
ROM  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
Psicología  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Implementation of a routine outcome monitoring and feedback system for psychotherapy in Argentina: A pilot study  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-12-07T17:45:29Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
1664-1078  
dc.journal.volume
13  
dc.journal.number
5  
dc.journal.pagination
1-10  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.journal.ciudad
Lausanne  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Manubens, Rocío Tamara. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Areas, Malenka Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fernández Álvarez, Javier. University of Bern; Suiza. Universitat Jaume I; España. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Meglio, Manuel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Babl, Anna. Adelphi University; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Juan, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ronchi, Agnese. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Muiños, Roberto Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Roussos, Andres Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Psicología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lutz, Wolfgang. Universitat Trier; Alemania  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Grosse Holtforth, Martin. University of Bern; Suiza. University Hospital Insel; Suiza  
dc.journal.title
Frontiers in Psychology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029164/full  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029164