Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Peasgood, Tessa
dc.contributor.author
Mukuria, Clara
dc.contributor.author
Brazier, John
dc.contributor.author
Marten, Ole
dc.contributor.author
Kreimeier, Simone
dc.contributor.author
Luo, Nan
dc.contributor.author
Mulhern, Brendan
dc.contributor.author
Greiner, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.author
Pickard, A. Simon
dc.contributor.author
Augustovski, Federico Ariel
dc.contributor.author
Engel, Lidia
dc.contributor.author
Gibbons, Luz
dc.contributor.author
Yang, Zhihao
dc.contributor.author
Monteiro, Andrea L.
dc.contributor.author
Kuharic, Maja
dc.contributor.author
Belizan, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Bjørner, Jakob
dc.date.available
2023-10-30T11:48:03Z
dc.date.issued
2022-04
dc.identifier.citation
Peasgood, Tessa; Mukuria, Clara; Brazier, John; Marten, Ole; Kreimeier, Simone; et al.; Developing a New Generic Health and Wellbeing Measure: Psychometric Survey Results for the EQ-HWB; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Value In Health; 25; 4; 4-2022; 525-533
dc.identifier.issn
1098-3015
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216319
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: The development of measures such as the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing) requires selection of items. This study explored the psychometric performance of candidate items, testing their validity in patients, social carer users, and carers. Methods: Article and online surveys that included candidate items (N = 64) were conducted in Argentina, Australia, China, Germany, United Kingdom, and the United States. Psychometric assessment on missing data, response distributions, and known group differences was undertaken. Dimensionality was explored using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Poorly fitting items were identified using information functions, and the function of each response category was assessed using category characteristic curves from item response theory (IRT) models. Differential item functioning was tested across key subgroups. Results: There were 4879 respondents (Argentina = 508, Australia = 514, China = 497, Germany = 502, United Kingdom = 1955, United States = 903). Where missing data were allowed, it was low (UK article survey 2.3%; US survey 0.6%). Most items had responses distributed across all levels. Most items could discriminate between groups with known health conditions with moderate to large effect sizes. Items were less able to discriminate across carers. Factor analysis found positive and negative measurement factors alongside the constructs of interest. For most of the countries apart from China, the confirmatory factor analysis model had good fit with some minor modifications. IRT indicated that most items had well-functioning response categories but there was some evidence of differential item functioning in many items. Conclusions: Items performed well in classical psychometric testing and IRT. This large 6-country collaboration provided evidence to inform item selection for the EQ-HWB measure.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
EQ-HWB
dc.subject
HEALTH AND WELLBEING
dc.subject
ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
dc.subject
ITEM SELECTION
dc.subject
MEASUREMENT DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
PSYCHOMETRICS
dc.subject
QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE-YEAR
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias de la Salud
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
dc.title
Developing a New Generic Health and Wellbeing Measure: Psychometric Survey Results for the EQ-HWB
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-10-27T16:12:59Z
dc.journal.volume
25
dc.journal.number
4
dc.journal.pagination
525-533
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Peasgood, Tessa. University Of Sheffield (university Of Sheffield);
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mukuria, Clara. University Of Sheffield (university Of Sheffield);
dc.description.fil
Fil: Brazier, John. University Of Sheffield (university Of Sheffield);
dc.description.fil
Fil: Marten, Ole. Universitat Bielefeld; Alemania
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kreimeier, Simone. Universitat Bielefeld; Alemania
dc.description.fil
Fil: Luo, Nan. National University of Singapore; Singapur
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mulhern, Brendan. University of Technology Sydney; Australia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Greiner, Wolfgang. Universitat Bielefeld; Alemania
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pickard, A. Simon. University of Illinois; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Augustovski, Federico Ariel. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Engel, Lidia. Deakin University; Australia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gibbons, Luz. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Yang, Zhihao. Guizhou Medical University; China
dc.description.fil
Fil: Monteiro, Andrea L.. University of Illinois; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kuharic, Maja. University of Illinois; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Belizan, Maria. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bjørner, Jakob. No especifíca;
dc.journal.title
Value In Health
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1361
Archivos asociados