Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cohen, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Gottifredi, Sebastián
dc.contributor.author
García, Alejandro Javier
dc.contributor.author
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
dc.date.available
2017-07-28T21:13:40Z
dc.date.issued
2013-11
dc.identifier.citation
Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastián; García, Alejandro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 29; 5; 11-2013; 513-550
dc.identifier.issn
0269-8889
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21611
dc.description.abstract
In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Argumentation
dc.subject
Abstract Argumentation
dc.subject
Argument Support
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación e Información
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2017-07-28T17:52:55Z
dc.journal.volume
29
dc.journal.number
5
dc.journal.pagination
513-550
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cohen, Andrea. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computacion; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Knowledge Engineering Review
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888913000325
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/a-survey-of-different-approaches-to-support-in-argumentation-systems/FB2BCF2F29B88594F1B8570075D17D38
Archivos asociados