Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Haedo, Joana Paola  
dc.contributor.author
Graffigna, Sofia  
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Lucía C.  
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Méndez, Néstor  
dc.contributor.author
Torretta, Juan Pablo  
dc.contributor.author
Marrero, Hugo Javier  
dc.date.available
2023-10-26T16:09:40Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Haedo, Joana Paola; Graffigna, Sofia; Martínez, Lucía C.; Pérez Méndez, Néstor; Torretta, Juan Pablo; et al.; Effectiveness landscape of crop pollinator assemblages: Implications to pollination service management; Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 348; 6-2023; 1-8  
dc.identifier.issn
0167-8809  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216065  
dc.description.abstract
There is a growing consensus that the world is facing a pollination crisis. To mitigate crop pollination deficits, some management strategies include the massive introduction of managed bee species, yet quite often they are applied blindly, as information on crop pollination effectiveness for each single pollinator species of assemblages is usually not available. Therefore, the introduction on managed species is not always the best option to improve crop yields. Here, by using the highly pollinator-dependent alfalfa crop (Medicago sativa L.) as a case study, we propose the use of the effectiveness landscape framework to identify key crop pollinator species. According to this framework, in a mutualistic interaction, each species´ effectiveness is represented by the product of a quantitative component and a qualitative one, these being measures of the outcomes of this interaction. We applied this framework for two managed and four wild bee species that visit alfalfa in fields southwest of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. We dissected the quantity components of the pollinator effectiveness landscape by estimating two quantitative subcomponents: visitation rate and flower tripping rate. Also, we estimate pod set as a qualitative component without dissecting it in subcomponents. Our results showed that the contribution of both components and the resulting pollinator effectiveness varied among pollinator species, indicating a contrasting effectiveness of different bee species on alfalfa pollination. For example, pollinator effectiveness was higher for managed than for wild bees, as consequence of their very high visitation rate, however, wild bee flower tripping rate and pod set were as high as managed ones. In fact, wild bees were more effective in promoting flower tripping than one of the managed bees (A. mellifera). This approach allowed us to assess which effectiveness components and subcomponents make pollinator species more or less effective, thus providing valuable information to identify key species to be enhanced to help in closing yield gaps. We suggest that the application of the effectiveness landscape framework would be useful to develop strategies to improve crop pollination service in pollinator-dependent crop systems.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ALFALFA  
dc.subject
APIS MELLIFERA  
dc.subject
CROP POLLINATION  
dc.subject
EFFECTIVENESS LANDSCAPE  
dc.subject
FLOWER TRIPPING  
dc.subject
MEGACHILE ROTUNDATA  
dc.subject
POLLINATION EFFECTIVENESS  
dc.subject
WILD BEES  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Naturales y Exactas  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Naturales y Exactas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Effectiveness landscape of crop pollinator assemblages: Implications to pollination service management  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-10-25T17:47:46Z  
dc.journal.volume
348  
dc.journal.pagination
1-8  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Haedo, Joana Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Graffigna, Sofia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Botánica General; Argentina. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez, Lucía C.. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pérez Méndez, Néstor. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. - Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural; Argentina. Inst. de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaries. Estació Experimental de l'Ebre, Amposta; España  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Torretta, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Cátedra de Botánica General; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Marrero, Hugo Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880923000762  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108417