Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Olmos, Leandro Hipolito  
dc.contributor.author
Pantiu, Andrea Julia  
dc.contributor.author
Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin  
dc.contributor.author
Valencia, P.N.  
dc.contributor.author
Cayo, P.N.  
dc.contributor.author
Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro  
dc.contributor.author
Micheloud, Juan Francisco  
dc.date.available
2023-10-06T14:16:45Z  
dc.date.issued
2022-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Olmos, Leandro Hipolito; Pantiu, Andrea Julia; Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin; Valencia, P.N.; Cayo, P.N.; et al.; Comparison of two coprological methods for the diagnosis of Eurytrema ssp. in cattle and sheep; Cambridge University Press; Journal of Helminthology; 96; e53; 7-2022; 1-4  
dc.identifier.issn
0022-149X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/214335  
dc.description.abstract
Eurytrematosis is a disease caused by flukes of the genus Eurytrema. These parasites infect the pancreatic ducts of a wide variety of species, including cattle, sheep and humans. Diagnosing eurytrematosis through the analysis of faecal samples can be difficult because most of the available techniques are considered of low sensitivity. In this context, a modification of the Dennis, Stone and Swanson technique (Belem Sedimentation Technique, BST) was previously developed to increase the probability of detecting infected animals; nevertheless, the values of eggs per gram obtained using the modified technique are generally low. We proposed a modification of the this technique (MBST), to increase the sensitivity and detection rate of infected animals. The objective of this work was to describe MBST and compare it with BST. Faecal samples of 212 clinically healthy animals (174 from cattle and 38 from sheep) from 20 farms were taken by the intra-rectal route and stored at 4°C. The samples were processed using BST and MBST. Positive samples amounted to 55 (25.9%) using BST and 121 (57.1%) using MBST. In the simples from cattle, 52 (29.8%) and 107 (61.4%) were positive in BST and MBST, respectively. In sheep, three (7.8%) and 14 (36.8%) positive samples were obtained in BST and MBST, respectively.The results obtained using the two methods were significantly different, indicating a lack of agreement between their findings. The results suggest that MBST is a more sensitive method to detect Eurytrema spp. eggs in faeces than BST.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
EURYTREMA  
dc.subject
DIAGNOSIS  
dc.subject
COPROLOGY  
dc.subject
SEDIMENTATION  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Comparison of two coprological methods for the diagnosis of Eurytrema ssp. in cattle and sheep  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-08-08T13:39:01Z  
dc.journal.volume
96  
dc.journal.number
e53  
dc.journal.pagination
1-4  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Olmos, Leandro Hipolito. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pantiu, Andrea Julia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Misiones. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Valencia, P.N.. Instituto San Cayetano N° 8092; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cayo, P.N.. Instituto San Cayetano N° 8092; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigacion de la Cadena Lactea. - Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigacion de la Cadena Lactea.; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública Veterinaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Micheloud, Juan Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Helminthology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-helminthology/article/abs/comparison-of-two-coprological-methods-for-the-diagnosis-of-eurytrema-ssp-in-cattle-and-sheep/F240BADD6A4FC46156DFA71B9ADACBBC  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X22000414