Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Olmos, Leandro Hipolito

dc.contributor.author
Pantiu, Andrea Julia

dc.contributor.author
Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin

dc.contributor.author
Valencia, P.N.
dc.contributor.author
Cayo, P.N.
dc.contributor.author
Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro

dc.contributor.author
Micheloud, Juan Francisco

dc.date.available
2023-10-06T14:16:45Z
dc.date.issued
2022-07
dc.identifier.citation
Olmos, Leandro Hipolito; Pantiu, Andrea Julia; Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin; Valencia, P.N.; Cayo, P.N.; et al.; Comparison of two coprological methods for the diagnosis of Eurytrema ssp. in cattle and sheep; Cambridge University Press; Journal of Helminthology; 96; e53; 7-2022; 1-4
dc.identifier.issn
0022-149X
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/214335
dc.description.abstract
Eurytrematosis is a disease caused by flukes of the genus Eurytrema. These parasites infect the pancreatic ducts of a wide variety of species, including cattle, sheep and humans. Diagnosing eurytrematosis through the analysis of faecal samples can be difficult because most of the available techniques are considered of low sensitivity. In this context, a modification of the Dennis, Stone and Swanson technique (Belem Sedimentation Technique, BST) was previously developed to increase the probability of detecting infected animals; nevertheless, the values of eggs per gram obtained using the modified technique are generally low. We proposed a modification of the this technique (MBST), to increase the sensitivity and detection rate of infected animals. The objective of this work was to describe MBST and compare it with BST. Faecal samples of 212 clinically healthy animals (174 from cattle and 38 from sheep) from 20 farms were taken by the intra-rectal route and stored at 4°C. The samples were processed using BST and MBST. Positive samples amounted to 55 (25.9%) using BST and 121 (57.1%) using MBST. In the simples from cattle, 52 (29.8%) and 107 (61.4%) were positive in BST and MBST, respectively. In sheep, three (7.8%) and 14 (36.8%) positive samples were obtained in BST and MBST, respectively.The results obtained using the two methods were significantly different, indicating a lack of agreement between their findings. The results suggest that MBST is a more sensitive method to detect Eurytrema spp. eggs in faeces than BST.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press

dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
EURYTREMA
dc.subject
DIAGNOSIS
dc.subject
COPROLOGY
dc.subject
SEDIMENTATION
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias

dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias

dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS

dc.title
Comparison of two coprological methods for the diagnosis of Eurytrema ssp. in cattle and sheep
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-08-08T13:39:01Z
dc.journal.volume
96
dc.journal.number
e53
dc.journal.pagination
1-4
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido

dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Olmos, Leandro Hipolito. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pantiu, Andrea Julia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Misiones. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Avellaneda Caceres, Agustin. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Valencia, P.N.. Instituto San Cayetano N° 8092; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cayo, P.N.. Instituto San Cayetano N° 8092; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigacion de la Cadena Lactea. - Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigacion de la Cadena Lactea.; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Salud Pública Veterinaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Micheloud, Juan Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido; Argentina. Universidad Catolica de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal of Helminthology

dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-helminthology/article/abs/comparison-of-two-coprological-methods-for-the-diagnosis-of-eurytrema-ssp-in-cattle-and-sheep/F240BADD6A4FC46156DFA71B9ADACBBC
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X22000414
Archivos asociados