Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Lama, Florencia  
dc.contributor.author
Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra  
dc.contributor.author
Reboreda, Juan Carlos  
dc.contributor.author
de Marsico, Maria Cecilia  
dc.date.available
2023-10-03T09:59:27Z  
dc.date.issued
2022-05  
dc.identifier.citation
Lama, Florencia; Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra; Reboreda, Juan Carlos; de Marsico, Maria Cecilia; Vocal trickery allows specialist screaming cowbird juveniles to escape host discrimination after leaving the nest; Springer; Behavioral Ecology And Sociobiology; 76; 5; 5-2022; 1-11  
dc.identifier.issn
0340-5443  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213860  
dc.description.abstract
Agonistic interactions between obligate avian brood parasites and their hosts can lead to the coevolution at any stage of the nesting cycle, yet adaptations and counter-adaptations at the fledgling stage are poorly known. Young of the host-specialist screaming cowbird (Molothrus rufoaxillaris) closely resemble those of its greyish baywing (Agelaioides badius) host in appearance and begging calls. This overall similarity has shown to be adaptive to escape host discrimination after leaving the nest, but the role of acoustic signals in host deception remained unclear. We examined whether baywing parents are able to distinguish between begging calls of mimetic and non-mimetic fledglings and whether screaming cowbirds can trick host parents by vocally resembling host young. We conducted a field playback experiment using fledgling calls of screaming cowbird (mimetic), shiny cowbird (M. bonariensis; non-mimetic) and baywing (conspecific control) in the absence of any visual stimuli. Baywings were significantly less responsive to non-mimetic shiny cowbird calls than to the other call types and more responsive to screaming cowbird calls than to conspecific calls. The results support the idea that baywings cue in on species-specific acoustic signals for fledgling recognition and that vocal similarity to host young in screaming cowbirds plays a role in host deception. The observed host preference for screaming cowbird over conspecific calls further suggests that vocal mimicry in brood parasites could be reinforced by the expression of acoustic features that either act as a supernormal stimulus or exploit host’s pre-existing sensory biases. Significance statement: Brood-parasitic screaming cowbird juveniles closely resemble those of its primary host, the greyish baywing, in plumage appearance and vocalizations. Using a field playback experiment, we studied the ability of adult baywings to discriminate against foreign juveniles based on vocal cues, in the absence of any visual stimuli. Baywings responded differentially to own-species and non-mimetic calls, and even more, they were more attracted to screaming cowbird calls than to those of conspecific juveniles. The study supports the idea that baywings use acoustic signals to distinguish between their own and foreign fledglings, thus favouring the evolution of vocal mimicry in its specialist brood parasite. Moreover, the results suggest that screaming cowbird fledglings would be even more effective than host’s own young in attracting parental attention through their begging calls.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BEGGING CALLS  
dc.subject
BROOD PARASITISM  
dc.subject
COEVOLUTION  
dc.subject
COWBIRD  
dc.subject
FLEDGLINGS  
dc.subject
MIMICRY  
dc.subject.classification
Zoología, Ornitología, Entomología, Etología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Vocal trickery allows specialist screaming cowbird juveniles to escape host discrimination after leaving the nest  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-07-07T22:28:23Z  
dc.journal.volume
76  
dc.journal.number
5  
dc.journal.pagination
1-11  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Berlin  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lama, Florencia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ursino, Cynthia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reboreda, Juan Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: de Marsico, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Behavioral Ecology And Sociobiology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03175-9