Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Arrieta, Ramiro Santiago  
dc.contributor.author
Campagna, Leonardo  
dc.contributor.author
Mahler, Bettina  
dc.contributor.author
Llambias, Paulo  
dc.date.available
2023-09-29T19:14:54Z  
dc.date.issued
2022-10  
dc.identifier.citation
Arrieta, Ramiro Santiago; Campagna, Leonardo; Mahler, Bettina; Llambias, Paulo; Neither paternity loss nor perceived threat of cuckoldry affects male nestling provisioning in grass wrens; Springer; Behavioral Ecology And Sociobiology; 76; 11; 10-2022; 1-10  
dc.identifier.issn
0340-5443  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/213683  
dc.description.abstract
Abstract: Extra-pair paternity (EPP) is frequent in socially monogamous birds with biparental care. However, males should avoid providing care to unrelated offspring. In this study, we first analyzed the relationship between parental care and paternity loss, and secondly, we evaluated if males adjust parental care to a perceived threat of cuckoldry. Over three breeding seasons, we intensively studied a color-banded population of south temperate grass wrens Cistothorus platensis. We monitored nests attended by socially monogamous males, collected blood samples from adults and nestlings, and recorded male provisioning rates to the nestlings. Paternity was assigned genetically using SNP markers. We simulated territorial intrusions during the female fertile period (egg-laying) to manipulate males’ perceived threat of cuckoldry. Neither the proportion of extra-pair offspring nor the presence/absence of extra-pair offspring in the nest affected male provisioning rates, suggesting that males did not adjust parental effort to actual paternity loss. Simulated territorial intrusions revealed that males were more likely to approach and attack a conspecific than a heterospecific stuffed decoy. However, experimental and control males provided food to their nestlings at similar rates. Retaliatory reduction of paternal care might not have evolved in grass wrens given the low frequency of extra-pair paternity (23%). Alternatively, males may rely predominately on precopulatory strategies (e.g., territoriality and mate guarding) to prevent females from obtaining extra-pair fertilizations. Significance statement: A central tenet in the study of extra-pair behavior in birds is that males should reduce their parental contribution when females engage in extra-pair copulations. Males are thought to use indirect clues (female absences, male intrusions) and direct clues (observation of copulations) to gauge paternity loss. We studied the relationship between extra-pair behavior and male contribution to feeding nestlings in a Neotropical population of grass wrens. We found that males did not adjust their contribution to paternal care based on actual paternity loss. Moreover, simulated male intrusions during the female fertile period, which influence a male’s perceived threat of cuckoldry, did not affect paternal care. Our results suggest that male grass wrens do not indirectly retaliate against females who engage in extra-pair behavior by reducing parental care.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CISTOTHORUS PLATENSIS  
dc.subject
EXTRA-PAIR PATERNITY  
dc.subject
NEOTROPIC  
dc.subject
PATERNAL CARE  
dc.subject.classification
Zoología, Ornitología, Entomología, Etología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Neither paternity loss nor perceived threat of cuckoldry affects male nestling provisioning in grass wrens  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-07-07T22:12:47Z  
dc.journal.volume
76  
dc.journal.number
11  
dc.journal.pagination
1-10  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Berlin  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Arrieta, Ramiro Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Campagna, Leonardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; Argentina. Cornell University; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mahler, Bettina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Llambias, Paulo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Behavioral Ecology And Sociobiology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-022-03253-y  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03253-y