Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Fróes de Borja Reis, André
dc.contributor.author
Moro Rosso, Luiz H.
dc.contributor.author
Davidson, Dan
dc.contributor.author
Kovács, Péter
dc.contributor.author
Purcell, Larry C.
dc.contributor.author
Below, Frederick E.
dc.contributor.author
Casteel, Shaun N.
dc.contributor.author
Knott, Carrie
dc.contributor.author
Kandel, Hans
dc.contributor.author
Naeve, Seth L.
dc.contributor.author
Carciochi, Walter Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Ross, Willian J.
dc.contributor.author
Rampazzo Favoretto, Vitor
dc.contributor.author
Archontoulis, Sotirios
dc.contributor.author
Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
dc.date.available
2023-09-21T14:50:53Z
dc.date.issued
2021-07
dc.identifier.citation
Fróes de Borja Reis, André; Moro Rosso, Luiz H.; Davidson, Dan; Kovács, Péter; Purcell, Larry C.; et al.; Sulfur fertilization in soybean: A meta-analysis on yield and seed composition; Elsevier Science; European Journal of Agronomy; 127; 7-2021; 1-10
dc.identifier.issn
1161-0301
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/212529
dc.description.abstract
Sulfur (S) deficiency has been recently reported in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] producing regions across the United States. However, field studies have often failed to demonstrate a strong relationship between yield and S fertilization and generally attributing the lack of yield response to unfavorable weather and high soil S supply. In addition, only a few reports described seed composition changes due to S availability under contrasting field conditions. Therefore, our goals were (i) to implement a meta-analytic model to quantify the effect of S application at different growth stages on yield and seed concentration of protein, oil, essential non-S amino acids, and S amino acids (SAA, cysteine and methionine); ii) identify environmental factors underpinning the response of S to these plant traits. Field experiments were carried out from 2017 to 2019 growing seasons with a total of 44 unique site-years conditions across 18 locations in 8 states. Mineral S fertilizer (sulfate/ elemental S) was supplied depending on the study at sowing, vegetative and/or reproductive stages. A random-effects multilevel meta-analysis was conducted. The effect sizes compared yield and seed composition responses relative to the unfertilized control. A principal component analysis (PCA) separated distinctive environmental conditions and a sub-grouped meta-analysis with the main environmental factors was later executed to understand the response of the plant traits with those factors. Seed protein concentration increased by 0.3 % when S was applied at sowing. The concentration of SAA increased by ca. 1% regardless of the fertilization timing. Sites exposed to drought stress (18–29% reduction of potential transpiration) neither presented changes in yield nor seed composition due to S fertilization. Soils with organic matter between 25 and 32 g kg-1 (medium cluster) displayed significant responses to S application. This research brings extensive data and provides a comprehensive analysis of weather and soil attributes influencing soybean yield and seed composition responses to S availability.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
CYSTEINE
dc.subject
METHIONINE
dc.subject
PROTEIN CONCENTRATION
dc.subject
SEED NUTRITIONAL QUALITY
dc.subject
SULFUR AMINO ACIDS
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Sulfur fertilization in soybean: A meta-analysis on yield and seed composition
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-09-18T13:36:56Z
dc.journal.volume
127
dc.journal.pagination
1-10
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fróes de Borja Reis, André. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Moro Rosso, Luiz H.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Davidson, Dan. No especifíca;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kovács, Péter. University of South Dakota; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Purcell, Larry C.. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Below, Frederick E.. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Casteel, Shaun N.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Knott, Carrie. University of Kentucky; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kandel, Hans. North Dakota State University; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Naeve, Seth L.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Carciochi, Walter Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ross, Willian J.. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rampazzo Favoretto, Vitor. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Archontoulis, Sotirios. ;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos
dc.journal.title
European Journal of Agronomy
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126285
Archivos asociados