Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Kebede, Yodit  
dc.contributor.author
Baudron, Frédéric  
dc.contributor.author
Bianchi, Felix  
dc.contributor.author
Tittonell, Pablo  
dc.date.available
2023-08-24T14:21:34Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Kebede, Yodit; Baudron, Frédéric; Bianchi, Felix; Tittonell, Pablo; Unpacking the push-pull system: Assessing the contribution of companion crops along a gradient of landscape complexity; Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 268; 12-2018; 115-123  
dc.identifier.issn
0167-8809  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/209246  
dc.description.abstract
The push-pull system, a stimulo-deterrent cropping strategy consisting of intercropping cereals with herbaceous legumes and surrounded by fodder grasses, is presented as a promising crop diversification strategy for smallholder farmers in Africa as it may contribute to maize stemborer Busseola fusca (Fuller) suppression, while improving soil fertility and providing feed for livestock. The push-pull system has often been assessed at plot level and as a package (e.g., Maize + Desmodium + Napier grass). However, it is unclear how the system performs in different landscape settings or when companion crops are changed to better meet household needs. Here we evaluate the potential of the push-pull system to suppress maize stemborer infestations in three landscapes in the Rift Valley region of Ethiopia along a gradient of landscape complexity. Within each landscape, experimental plots were established on four representative smallholder farms. At each farm we used a split-plot factorial design with main plots surrounded or not by Napier grass, and subplots consisting of sole maize, maize-bean or maize-Desmodium. We assessed stemborer infestation level and maize grain and stover yields during two years, as well as natural enemies abundance and egg predation at two maize development stages in the second year. In the simple landscape, which was dominated by maize, all treatments had high stemborer infestation levels, irrespective of within-field crop diversity; the presence of Napier grass was associated with higher predator abundance, while egg predation rates were the highest in the maize-bean intercrop. In the intermediate complexity landscape, subplots with sole maize had higher stemborer infestation levels compared to maize-bean or maize-Desmodium. In the complex landscape, infestation levels were low in all treatments. However, none of these effects led to significant differences in maize grain and stover yields among treatments in any of the landscapes. The benefits of the push-pull system accrued from the companion crops (bean, Desmodium and Napier), rather than from stemborer suppression per se. Our findings highlight the importance of the surrounding landscape in mediating the performance of the push-pull system, provide new insights on the contribution of the different components of push-pull system and can guide the design of ecologically intensive agroecosystems.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
AFRICA  
dc.subject
AGROECOLOGY  
dc.subject
BIOCONTROL  
dc.subject
BUSSEOLA FUSCA (FULLER)  
dc.subject
ETHIOPIA  
dc.subject
GENERALIST PREDATORS  
dc.subject
HABITAT MANAGEMENT  
dc.subject
LANDSCAPE  
dc.subject
LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Agrícolas  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Agrícolas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Unpacking the push-pull system: Assessing the contribution of companion crops along a gradient of landscape complexity  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-08-15T23:08:44Z  
dc.journal.volume
268  
dc.journal.pagination
115-123  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kebede, Yodit. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Baudron, Frédéric. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; Zimbabue  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bianchi, Felix. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tittonell, Pablo. University of Agriculture Wageningen; Países Bajos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.012  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918303931