Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Scarfi, Juan Pablo
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2023-08-08T15:31:32Z
dc.date.issued
2021-10
dc.identifier.citation
Scarfi, Juan Pablo; Counterpoints for a New Agenda in the Study of Global Injustices; Routledge; Cambridge Review of International Affairs; 34; 6; 10-2021; 855-860
dc.identifier.issn
0955-7571
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/207386
dc.description.abstract
Debates about global justice have long dominated the fields of political theory, IR, international law and the social sciences and humanities in general since at least the 1990s. Global justice as a field emerged in the Anglo-American (and analytical) tradition with its own abstract framework based on ideal theorizing, as pioneered by John Rawls, and generated its own internal and rather ahistor- ical debates within that tradition. This is not to say that its main concerns were not relevant to other scholarship and academic traditions, but global jus- tice remained for a long time a confined field to the extent that scholars out- side the analytical Anglo-American tradition very rarely engaged with it. It does not come as a surprise that the emergence of global justice in the 1990s as a central area in international political and legal theory coincided with what Martti Koskenniemi has suggestively termed theet hical turn in human rights, that is, the adoption of individual human rights as the main regulatory prin- ciple in global politics. Yet in recent years a new body of scholarship in polit- ical theory, IR and international law has contributed to shift the focus from this previous ethical turn towards a historical turn, exploring how past his- torical injustices, such the past legacies of empire, colonialism, international inequalities and racism have shaped the contemporary international order and its current institutional structure of global governance.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Routledge
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Global Justice
dc.subject
Empire
dc.subject
Race
dc.subject
International Relations
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencia Política
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Counterpoints for a New Agenda in the Study of Global Injustices
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-08-08T12:56:40Z
dc.identifier.eissn
1474-449X
dc.journal.volume
34
dc.journal.number
6
dc.journal.pagination
855-860
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Scarfi, Juan Pablo. Universidad de San Andrés. Departamento de Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2021.1994307
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2021.1994307
Archivos asociados