Effect of Some Environmental and Stainless Steel Metallurgical Variables on the Values of Degree of Sensitization Measured by the Double Loop-Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation Test

Abstract

The double loop-electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (DL-EPR) method estimates the degree of sensitization in stainless steels with ir/ia, the ratio of peak current densities during reactivation (reverse) and activation (forward) scans. Beyond sensitization level, other metallurgical variables, like inclusion content and cold work, or testing environment variables, like solution deaeration and solution aging, could potentially affect ir/ia. Austenitic stainless steel Types AISI 304 (UNS S30400) and AISI 303 (UNS S30300) were tested to assess the effect of those secondary variables on ir/ia. AISI 303 stainless steel had similar chromium and nickel contents to AISI 304, but higher contents of sulfur, resulting in a higher volume fraction of inclusions. ir/ia increased with inclusion content and decreased with cold work in AISI 304 stainless steel. In all cases, the DL-EPR test could discriminate solubilized from thermally aged specimens because confidence intervals of respective samples never overlapped. The testing solution was 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 + 0.01 mol/L KSCN, (sulfuric acid and potassium thiocyanate solution) and a common practice is to freshly prepare it just before the test. Measurements are usually performed under deaerated conditions. However, deployment of the technique, especially in the field, could be facilitated if naturally aerated solutions prepared in advance in a laboratory can be used. The oxygen content in solution and solution aging did not have a statistically significant effect on ir/ia.