Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cimadamore, Alberto Daniel
dc.contributor.other
Veltmeyer, Henry
dc.contributor.other
Bouwles, Paul
dc.date.available
2023-07-20T15:52:12Z
dc.date.issued
2022
dc.identifier.citation
Cimadamore, Alberto Daniel; The dynamics of poverty production: A political economy perspective for the SDGs era; Routledge; 2022; 189-196
dc.identifier.isbn
978-0-367-47885-8
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/204664
dc.description.abstract
Understanding the social dynamics of poverty requires the identification of the systemic forces that feed and condition the production and reproduction of poverty.The inter- action of agents operating within diverse types of structures is relevant for explaining the persistence of poverty in a world where there are enough resources to eliminate it, at least in its most extreme forms.This issue is particularly relevant today due to the prom- inent place poverty reduction (if not eradication) has in the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015).It has been argued that development cannot be understood in a mechanical way using linear analysis of structure and agency (Munck, 2018: 1). I am conscious that both struc- ture and agency-based models typically involve large numbers of interactions and com- plexities due to the multidimensionality involved in the production and reproduction of wicked social problems like poverty. However, the level of abstraction involved in struc- tural approaches allows for a simplification that is useful not only for the understanding but also for the eventual solution of such problems.The examination of agents and agencies ́ use of opportunities and relative power would allow us to overcome most of the common problems coming from linear and mechanical analysis referred to by Munck and others.The significance of the issue highlighted in the first paragraph is apparent at a time when the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is being implemented globally, its deadline is approaching, and the current COVID-19 pandemic has worsened socio-economic conditions and indicators for sustainable development worldwide. Sound political choices are required to achieve the objectives of Agenda 2030 and particularly to end poverty and hunger while pursuing an integral and indivisible set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets.To make political choices based on a theory explaining the sources of the persistence of problems like poverty is arguably more effective than the alternative. For this reason, I try to synthesise a theoretical framework aimed at explaining the structural conflict between market and states forces that conditions the efficacy of the ‘leave no one behind’ policy.This structural conflict, which can be traced out at both national and international levels, is at the core of the political economy of poverty production and reproduction.A theoretical model showing the relationship between states and markets can be used to clearly indicate where there is potential to change poverty dynamics. I will argue that historical forms of the state can be seen as part of the problem, but also as part of the solution to poverty within the sustainable development set of challenges posed by the 2030 Agenda.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Routledge
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Pobreza
dc.subject
Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS)
dc.subject
Economía Política
dc.subject
Dinámica y producción de pobreza
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinarias
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Sociales
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
The dynamics of poverty production: A political economy perspective for the SDGs era
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro
dc.date.updated
2023-07-07T22:58:44Z
dc.journal.pagination
189-196
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Abingdon
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cimadamore, Alberto Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-27
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.routledge.com/The-Essential-Guide-to-Critical-Development-Studies/Veltmeyer-Bowles/p/book/9780367478858
dc.conicet.paginas
412
dc.source.titulo
The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies
dc.conicet.nroedicion
2
Archivos asociados