Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Dvoskin, Ariel
dc.contributor.author
Trabucchi, Paolo
dc.contributor.other
Bellino, Enrico
dc.contributor.other
Nerozzi, Sebastiano
dc.date.available
2023-05-31T20:44:59Z
dc.date.issued
2022
dc.identifier.citation
Dvoskin, Ariel; Trabucchi, Paolo; Non-ergodic (in Place of Stationary, Timeless) Economic Systems: Considerations Suggested by Joan Robinson’s Distinction between Two ‘Notions’ of Time in Economic Theory; Cambridge University Press; 2022; 79-111
dc.identifier.isbn
978-1-108-83111-6
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/199262
dc.description.abstract
In seeking our path among the complex of questions raised by the fourth characteristic ascribed by Luigi Pasinetti to the Cambridge School (notoriously, questions pertaining to the ‘treatment of time’ stem in all directions and are reflected in practically any part of an economic theory), we believe it is convenient to start from a point Pasinetti himself refers to in his discussion of that characteristic: namely, the ‘sharp distinction made by Joan Robinson between logical time and historical time’ (Pasinetti, 2007, p. 226). The reason is the following. Originally, the distinction was proposed to give evidence to certain elements whereby the neoclassical theory would fail to give a satisfactory account of a process of capital accumulation. As we shall see, these are basically, though by no means exclusively, elements preventing a full recognition of the degree of irreversibility (‘non-ergodicity’) that would be the feature of certain economic processes, changes in ‘logical’ time being prevalently used by Robinson as a metaphor for perfectly reversible changes. The fact is, however, that at a certain point Robinson felt that the criticisms she had raised against the neoclassical theory should also be directed against the classical theory, at least in the version we find in Piero Sraffa’s Production of Commodities: ‘The specification of a selfreproducing ... system such as that of Sraffa ... is in logical time, not in history (Robinson, 1974 [1978], p. 128). This has understandably resulted in, or has possibly given expression to, a fundamental division within what Pasinetti calls the Cambridge School; and it is for this reason that, although the question has already been addressed a number of times and without being able to cover the vast literature that has accumulated on the subject, we feel that we should start our comment from this particular point.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Logical time
dc.subject
Historial Time
dc.subject
Joan Robinson
dc.subject
Surplus approach
dc.subject.classification
Economía, Econometría
dc.subject.classification
Economía y Negocios
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
Non-ergodic (in Place of Stationary, Timeless) Economic Systems: Considerations Suggested by Joan Robinson’s Distinction between Two ‘Notions’ of Time in Economic Theory
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro
dc.date.updated
2023-05-31T11:17:59Z
dc.journal.pagination
79-111
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dvoskin, Ariel. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Trabucchi, Paolo. Università Roma Tre III; Italia
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/pasinetti-and-the-classical-keynesians/nonergodic-in-place-of-stationary-timeless-economic-systems/F662EACD75A198676346CA33001E08E3
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/pasinetti-and-the-classical-keynesians/97CFEE8AAD41A1453640C50983FEEC04
dc.conicet.paginas
332
dc.source.titulo
Pasinetti and the Classical Keynesians: Nine Methodological Issues
Archivos asociados