Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Costanzo, Gabriel  
dc.contributor.author
Alvarado Pinedo, María Fiorella  
dc.contributor.author
Mon, Maria Laura  
dc.contributor.author
Viale, Mariana Noelia  
dc.contributor.author
Gil, Andres  
dc.contributor.author
Carrica Illia, Mariano  
dc.contributor.author
Gioffré, Andrea Karina  
dc.contributor.author
Arese, Alicia  
dc.contributor.author
Travería, Gabriel Eduardo  
dc.contributor.author
Romano, Maria Isabel  
dc.date.available
2023-04-26T13:22:20Z  
dc.date.issued
2012-04  
dc.identifier.citation
Costanzo, Gabriel; Alvarado Pinedo, María Fiorella; Mon, Maria Laura; Viale, Mariana Noelia; Gil, Andres; et al.; Accuracy assessment and screening of a dairy herd with paratuberculosis by three different ELISAs; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Microbiology; 156; 1-2; 4-2012; 183-188  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-1135  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195394  
dc.description.abstract
Although the culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisis is the gold standard for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis, this bacterium is difficult to grow. In contrast, serological tests like ELISAs are inexpensive, rapid, and easy to perform. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of three different ELISAs: one with the commercial antigen PPA-3, another one with L5P (a recently described lipopentapeptide), and a third one with an in-house antigen whole cell lysates (WCL) of M. avium (MAA) strain D4ER (Study 1), and to compare them with other tests for paratuberculosis (PTB) diagnosis (Study 2). In Study 1, the sensitivities of the three ELISAs tested were 74.1%, 37% and 74.1%, respectively, whereas their specificities were 98.9%, 100% and 100%, respectively. In Study 2, we compared the three above-mentioned ELISAs with the intradermal reaction test using Avian PPD (PPDa) and fecal culture associated with Ziehl-Neelsen stain and PCR tests, in a dairy herd with 4.6% of cows with clinical signs of PTB. The results showed that fecal samples from 14 cows (16%) were culture-positive and that fecal samples from nine cows (10%) were PPDa-positive. Most of these animals (culture-positive and PPDa-positive) were detected as positive with any of the three ELISAs tested. Serological results showed that 31% of the animals were positive to ELISA-PPA-3, 17% to ELISA-L5P and 42.5% to ELISA-WCL. The combination of these three ELISAs identified 50.6% of the animals as positive in the infected herd. In particular, the results show that the locally developed ELISA seems to be useful for identifying many infected animals in a herd.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
DIAGNOSIS  
dc.subject
ELISA  
dc.subject
PARATUBERCULOSIS  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Accuracy assessment and screening of a dairy herd with paratuberculosis by three different ELISAs  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-04-26T10:44:59Z  
dc.journal.volume
156  
dc.journal.number
1-2  
dc.journal.pagination
183-188  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Costanzo, Gabriel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alvarado Pinedo, María Fiorella. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Clínica. Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mon, Maria Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Viale, Mariana Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gil, Andres. Universidad de la Republica. Facultad de Veterinaria.; Uruguay  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Carrica Illia, Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gioffré, Andrea Karina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Arese, Alicia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Travería, Gabriel Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Departamento de Clínica. Centro de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Romano, Maria Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Veterinary Microbiology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113511005864  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.029