Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Mato, Daniel Alejandro
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2023-04-12T16:30:48Z
dc.date.issued
2011-05
dc.identifier.citation
Mato, Daniel Alejandro; There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable; Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd; Social Identities; 17; 3; 5-2011; 409-421
dc.identifier.issn
1350-4630
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193517
dc.description.abstract
Within some significant circles, where hegemonic representations of the idea of 'science' are produced, certain orientations of scientific research are carried out, and science and higher education policies are made and applied, references to the alleged existence of two kinds of knowledge, one of which would have 'universal' validity, and 'the other' (in fact the several others) would not, are frequent and do have crucial effects over our academic work. Although some outstanding authors within the very Western tradition have criticized from varied perspectives such universalist ambitions/assumptions, and although many colleagues have reached convergent conclusions from diverse kinds of practices and experiences, such hegemonic representations of the idea of science are still current. The acknowledgment of this situation calls for a deep debate. This article responds to such a purpose by attempting to integrate into the debate a reflection on the shortcomings of hegemonic academic knowledge to understand social processes profoundly marked by cultural differences, historical conflicts and inequalities, as well as significant perspectives formulated by some outstanding intellectuals who self-identify as indigenous, and the experiences of some indigenous intercultural universities from several Latin American countries.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
dc.subject
INTERCULTURAL COLLABORATION
dc.subject
KNOWLEDGE
dc.subject
POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
dc.subject
SCIENCE
dc.subject.classification
Otras Sociología
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Sociología
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
There is no 'universal' knowledge, intercultural collaboration is indispensable
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-04-11T12:01:50Z
dc.journal.volume
17
dc.journal.number
3
dc.journal.pagination
409-421
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mato, Daniel Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Social Identities
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.570978
Archivos asociados