Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Tríbulo, Andrés  
dc.contributor.author
Rogan, Dragan  
dc.contributor.author
Tribulo, Humberto Elias  
dc.contributor.author
Tríbulo, Ricardo Julio  
dc.contributor.author
Alasino, Roxana Valeria  
dc.contributor.author
Beltramo, Dante Miguel  
dc.contributor.author
Bianco, Ismael Dario  
dc.contributor.author
Mapletoft, Reuben J.  
dc.contributor.author
Bó, Gabriel A.  
dc.date.available
2023-03-14T12:48:37Z  
dc.date.issued
2011-11  
dc.identifier.citation
Tríbulo, Andrés; Rogan, Dragan; Tribulo, Humberto Elias; Tríbulo, Ricardo Julio; Alasino, Roxana Valeria; et al.; Superstimulation of ovarian follicular development in beef cattle with a single intramuscular injection of Folltropin-V; Elsevier Science; Animal Reproduction Science; 129; 1-2; 11-2011; 7-13  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-4320  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/190444  
dc.description.abstract
The need to inject FSH twice daily for superstimulation of ovarian follicular development in cattle necessitates frequent attention by farm-personnel and increases the possibility of failures due to mishandling and errors in administration of treatments. A series of three experiments were designed to evaluate the feasibility of superstimulation in beef cattle with a single intramuscular (IM) injection of Folltropin-V diluted in a hyaluronan-based slow-release formulation (SRF). In Experiment 1, cows were assigned to one of three treatment groups to compare two methods of injection as compared to the twice daily IM injection protocol. Superovulatory response of cows (n=6) treated with twice daily IM injections over 4 days (Control) was greater than of cows treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) injection in SRF (n=6), while superovulatory response of cows treated with a single IM injection in SRF (n=6) was intermediate. Experiment 2 was designed to compare two concentrations of SRF (20. mg/mL hyaluronan, 100% compared to 10. mg/mL hyaluronan, 50%) in a single IM injection protocol. The mean number of corpora lutea (CL) were not significantly different (P≥0.05), but the numbers of total ova/embryos (P<0.05), fertilized ova (P<0.01) and transferable embryos (P<0.001) were greater in cows treated with FSH in 100% SRF (n=20) than cows treated with FSH in 50% SRF (n=20). Experiment 3 was designed to compare superovulatory response in Red Angus donor cows treated with a single IM injection of Folltropin-V diluted in 100% solution of SRF with those treated with the traditional twice-daily IM injection protocol over 4 days. Mean (±SEM) numbers of CL (13.7±1.2 compared to 13.8±1.2), total ova/embryos (12.3± 1.5 compared to 13.7±2.1), fertilized ova (7.2±1.1 compared to 8.4±1.4) and transferable embryos (4.9±0.8 compared to 6.4±1.3) were not significantly different between Control (n=29) and Single injection (n=29) groups, respectively. In summary, superstimulation of beef donor cows with a single IM injection of Folltropin-V diluted in 100% solution of SRF resulted in a comparable superovulatory response to the traditional twice-daily IM administration of Folltropin-V diluted in saline over 4 days.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CATTLE  
dc.subject
FSH  
dc.subject
HYALURONAN  
dc.subject
INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION  
dc.subject
SUPEROVULATION  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Biotecnología Agropecuaria  
dc.subject.classification
Biotecnología Agropecuaria  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Superstimulation of ovarian follicular development in beef cattle with a single intramuscular injection of Folltropin-V  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-03-10T14:29:26Z  
dc.journal.volume
129  
dc.journal.number
1-2  
dc.journal.pagination
7-13  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tríbulo, Andrés. Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Rioja; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rogan, Dragan. No especifíca;  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tribulo, Humberto Elias. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tríbulo, Ricardo Julio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Rioja; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alasino, Roxana Valeria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. Provincia de Córdoba. Ministerio de Ciencia y Técnica. Centro de Excelencia en Productos y Procesos de Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Beltramo, Dante Miguel. Provincia de Córdoba. Ministerio de Ciencia y Técnica. Centro de Excelencia en Productos y Procesos de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bianco, Ismael Dario. Provincia de Córdoba. Ministerio de Ciencia y Técnica. Centro de Excelencia en Productos y Procesos de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mapletoft, Reuben J.. University of Saskatchewan; Canadá  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bó, Gabriel A.. Universidad Nacional de Villa María; Argentina. Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Animal Reproduction Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.10.013  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432011002715