Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Haedo, Joana Paola
dc.contributor.author
Martinez, Lucia Carolina
dc.contributor.author
Graffigna, Sofia
dc.contributor.author
Marrero, Hugo Javier
dc.contributor.author
Torretta, Juan Pablo
dc.date.available
2023-02-14T17:47:27Z
dc.date.issued
2022-02-01
dc.identifier.citation
Haedo, Joana Paola; Martinez, Lucia Carolina; Graffigna, Sofia; Marrero, Hugo Javier; Torretta, Juan Pablo; Managed and wild bees contribute to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) pollination; Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 324; 01-2-2022; 1-9; 107711
dc.identifier.issn
0167-8809
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/187992
dc.description.abstract
Biotic pollination is an essential ecosystem service for agricultural production and is reflected in the high number of crops that depend on insect pollination in order to produce profitable yields. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is a crop whose flowers need to be visited by a bee to be pollinated for seed production, making it highly pollinator-dependent. Two managed bee species are currently used to pollinate this crop: the alfalfa leafcutting bee (ALCB), one of the most efficient alfalfa pollinators, and the honey bee (HB), whose efficiencies could be highly variable among production sites. Besides, there are many other wild bee species (WBs) that are effective pollinators of alfalfa, but little attention has been placed on them, especially in Argentina, where alfalfa seed production is deficient. Here, we evaluate the contribution of both managed species and WBs on alfalfa pollination services in one of the most important alfalfa seed productive regions of Argentina. During the span of two years, we calculated pollen limitation in different pollinator managed scenarios: with and without ALCBs (ALCB+ and ALCB−, respectively), and we also evaluated the relationship between pollen limitation and all bee species visitation rates. Our results show that the ALCB is a very effective pollinator of alfalfa, since ALCB+ lots have less pollen limitation (32%) compared to ALCB− lots. In contrast, HBs seem to have a detrimental effect in pollination service in ALCB+ lots and a positive effect in ALCB− lots. This differential effect could be due to differences in foraging behavior caused by competition between HBs and ALCBs. Finally, in spite of their low abundances, we found that an increase in WB visitation rates substantially reduces pollen limitation. In spite of ALCBs being a good alfalfa pollinators, the difficulty and cost of managing them hinder its widespread use. The use of WBs seems to be a good alternative, and practices that improve their abundance and diversity should be implemented to improve alfalfa pollination service.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
ALFALFA
dc.subject
ALFALFA LEAFCUTTING BEE
dc.subject
HONEY BEE
dc.subject
MEDICAGO SATIVA
dc.subject
MEGACHILE ROTUNDATA
dc.subject
POLLINATION
dc.subject
WILD BEES
dc.subject.classification
Ecología
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Managed and wild bees contribute to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) pollination
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-02-09T16:01:04Z
dc.journal.volume
324
dc.journal.pagination
1-9; 107711
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Haedo, Joana Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martinez, Lucia Carolina. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Graffigna, Sofia. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Marrero, Hugo Javier. Laboratorio de Interacciones Bióticas en Agroecosistemas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Torretta, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880921004151
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107711
Archivos asociados