Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Mazzoni, A.
dc.contributor.author
Althabe, Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Liu, N. H.
dc.contributor.author
Bonotti, A. M.
dc.contributor.author
Gibbons, L.
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez, A. J.
dc.contributor.author
Belizán, J. M.
dc.date.available
2023-02-03T15:53:39Z
dc.date.issued
2011-03
dc.identifier.citation
Mazzoni, A.; Althabe, Fernando; Liu, N. H.; Bonotti, A. M.; Gibbons, L.; et al.; Women's preference for caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 118; 4; 3-2011; 391-399
dc.identifier.issn
1470-0328
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/186803
dc.description.abstract
Background The striking increase in caesarean section rates in middle- and high-income countries has been partly attributed to maternal request. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of women's preferences for caesarean section. Objectives To review the published literature on women's preferences for caesarean section. Search strategy A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and PsychINFO was performed. References of all included articles were examined. Selection criteria We included studies that quantitatively evaluated women's preferences for caesarean section in any country. We excluded articles assessing health providers' preferences and qualitative studies. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently screened abstracts of all identified citations, selected potentially eligible studies, and assessed their full-text versions. We conducted a meta-analysis of proportions, and a meta-regression analysis to determine variables significantly associated with caesarean section preference. Main results Thirty-eight studies were included (n = 19 403). The overall pooled preference for caesarean section was 15.6% (95% CI 12.5-18.9). Higher preference for caesarean section was reported in women with a previous caesarean section versus women without a previous caesarean section (29.4%; 95% CI 24.4-34.8 versus 10.1%; 95% CI 7.5-13.1), and those living in a middle-income country versus a high-income country (22.1%; 95% CI 17.6-26.9 versus 11.8%; 95% CI 8.9-15.1). Authors' conclusions Only a minority of women in a wide variety of countries expressed a preference for caesarean delivery. Further research is needed to better estimate the contribution of women's demand to the rising caesarean section rates.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
CAESAREAN SECTION
dc.subject
CHILDBIRTH
dc.subject
CHOICE
dc.subject
DELIVERY
dc.subject
OBSTETRIC
dc.subject
PREFER
dc.subject
REQUEST
dc.subject.classification
Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Clínica
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
dc.title
Women's preference for caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2023-02-02T12:49:52Z
dc.journal.volume
118
dc.journal.number
4
dc.journal.pagination
391-399
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mazzoni, A.. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Liu, N. H.. University of Nebraska; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bonotti, A. M.. No especifíca;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gibbons, L.. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sánchez, A. J.. No especifíca;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Belizán, J. M.. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.journal.title
BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x
Archivos asociados