Artículo
Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability: multiple, coordinated goals and holistic actions are critical
Díaz, Sandra Myrna
; Zafra Calvo, Noelia; Purvis, Andy; Verburg, Peter H.; Obura, David; Leadley, Paul; Chaplin Kramer, Rebecca; De Meester, Luc; Dulloo, Ehsan; Martín López, Berta; Shaw, M. Rebecca; Visconti, Piero; Broadgate, Wendy; Bruford, Michael W.; Burgess, Neil D.; Cavender Bares, Jeannine; DeClerck, Fabrice; Fernández Palacios, José María; Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
; Hill, Samantha L. L.; Isbell, Forest; Khoury, Colin K.; Krug, Cornelia B.; Liu, Jianguo; Maron, Martine; McGowan, Philip J. K.; Pereira, Henrique M.; Reyes García, Victoria; Rocha, Juan; Rondinini, Carlo
Fecha de publicación:
10/2020
Editorial:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Revista:
Science
ISSN:
0036-8075
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Global biodiversity policy is at a crossroads. Recent global assessments of living nature (1, 2) and climate (3) show worsening trends and a rapidly narrowing window for action. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has recently announced that none of the 20 Aichi targets for biodiversity it set in 2010 has been reached and only six have been partially achieved (4). Against this backdrop, nations are now negotiating the next generation of the CBD’s global goals [see supplementary materials (SM)], due for adoption in 2021, which will frame actions of governments and other actors for decades to come. In response to the goals proposed in the draft post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) made public by the CBD (5), we urge negotiators to consider three points that are critical if the agreed goals are to stabilize or reverse nature’s decline. First, multiple goals are required because of nature’s complexity, with different facets—genes, populations, species, deep evolutionary history, ecosystems, and their contributions to people—having markedly different geographic distributions and responses to human drivers. Second, interlinkages among these facets mean that goals must be defined and developed holistically rather than in isolation, with potential to advance multiple goals simultaneously and minimize trade-offs between them. Third, only the highest level of ambition in setting each goal, and implementing all goals in an integrated manner, will give a realistic chance of stopping—and beginning to reverse—biodiversity loss by 2050.
Palabras clave:
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY POLICY
,
BIODIVERSITY LOSS
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos (IRNAD)
Articulos de INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN RECURSOS NATURALES, AGROECOLOGIA Y DESARROLLO RURAL
Articulos de INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN RECURSOS NATURALES, AGROECOLOGIA Y DESARROLLO RURAL
Articulos(IMBIV)
Articulos de INST.MULTIDISCIPL.DE BIOLOGIA VEGETAL (P)
Articulos de INST.MULTIDISCIPL.DE BIOLOGIA VEGETAL (P)
Citación
Díaz, Sandra Myrna; Zafra Calvo, Noelia; Purvis, Andy; Verburg, Peter H.; Obura, David; et al.; Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability: multiple, coordinated goals and holistic actions are critical; American Association for the Advancement of Science; Science; 370; 6515; 10-2020; 411-413
Compartir
Altmétricas