Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review

Pingray, María Verónica; Widmer, M.; Ciapponi, AgustínIcon ; Hofmeyr, G.J.; Deneux, C.; Gülmezoglu, M.; Bloemenkamp, K.; Oladapo, O. T.; Comandé, D.; Bardach, Ariel EstebanIcon ; Vázquez, P.; Cormick, GabrielaIcon ; Althabe, FernandoIcon
Fecha de publicación: 06/2021
Editorial: Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
Revista: BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ISSN: 1470-0328
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Epidemiología

Resumen

Objectives: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. Search strategy: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. Study selection: Randomised and non-randomised comparative studies. Outcomes: Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy. Results: All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom-catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76–7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48–35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07–15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47–41.09) with the use of the condom-catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non-randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04–5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non-randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44–7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon. Conclusions: The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting. Tweetable abstract: Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery.
Palabras clave: BAKRI BALLOON , CONDOM UTERINE BALLOON TAMPONADE , HYSTERECTOMY , MATERNAL DEATH , POSTPARTUM HAEMORRHAGE , UTERINE ATONY , VAGINAL DELIVERY
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Thumbnail
 
Tamaño: 771.7Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Descargar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Unported (CC BY 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/185411
URL: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.16819
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819
Colecciones
Articulos(CIESP)
Articulos de CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN EPIDEMIOLOGIA Y SALUD PUBLICA
Citación
Pingray, María Verónica; Widmer, M.; Ciapponi, Agustín; Hofmeyr, G.J.; Deneux, C.; et al.; Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; BJOG - An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 128; 11; 6-2021; 1732-1743
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES