Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Maltese, Nicolás Elías  
dc.contributor.author
Maddonni, Gustavo Angel  
dc.contributor.author
Melchiori, Ricardo José Miguel  
dc.contributor.author
Ferreyra, J. M.  
dc.contributor.author
Caviglia, Octavio Pedro  
dc.date.available
2023-01-12T14:47:55Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-11  
dc.identifier.citation
Maltese, Nicolás Elías; Maddonni, Gustavo Angel; Melchiori, Ricardo José Miguel; Ferreyra, J. M.; Caviglia, Octavio Pedro; Crop nitrogen status of early- and late-sown maize at different plant densities; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 258; 11-2020; 1-10  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-4290  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184551  
dc.description.abstract
In maize (Zea mays L.) crops, nitrogen (N) status at silking (R1) has been used to predict grain yield (GY) response to N fertilization and to develop strategies to manage crop nutrition in order to match N supply with crop demand during growing season, such as late N fertilizations. Crop N status can be estimated by N nutrition index (NNI), which is based on actual and critical N concentration in crop biomass. Optical measurements of N concentration (e.g. SPAD readings) of the leaf blade subtending primary ear have also been used as a proxy of crop N status. Sowing date (SD) and N rates could affect soil N availability and hence crop N uptake at R1. Additionally, the effects of SD and its interaction with plant density (PD), N rates and hybrids (H) on N uptake (NuptP) and particularly on N partitioning in leaf-blades, stem + sheaths and ears could affect SPADs readings. We hypothesized that variations of GY by crop N status at R1 promoted by SD, PD and H, would be better predicted by NNI than by SPAD readings. In this study, two Hs (DK 70−10 VT3P and DK 73−10 VT3P) were cropped in two contrasting SD (early and late) in Paraná, Argentina (31°44′ S 60°32′ W) at three PD (5, 7 and 9 pl m−2) with three N rates (0, 90 and 270 kg N ha-1) in order to evaluate the effect of treatments on: i) N availability, N uptake at the plant and crop level, N partitioning in leaf-blades, stem + sheaths and ears, SPAD readings and NNI at R1, and ii) the relationships among N availability and N uptake at the plant and crop level, NNI, SPAD, and GY. N concentration of leaf-blades was negatively affected by PD, but this reduction was attenuated by N rates, especially in late SD (N x PD x SD interaction). Hence, in early SD, some data of both Hs corresponding to 270 N yielded low SPAD values for NNI greater than 0.86. Consequently, crop N status was better reflected by NNI than by SPAD readings, because NNI considers N stored in the whole plant. NNI at R1 adequately described relative GY variations promoted by SD, PD, N rates and, Hs, i.e. NNI was a more meaningful crop status index than SPAD readings. Overall, our study contributes to understanding mechanisms that regulate crop N status affected by agronomical practices and adds insights to explore in late N fertilization of maize crops.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR)  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CROP N STATUS  
dc.subject
N UPTAKE  
dc.subject
PLANT DENSITY  
dc.subject
SOWING DATE  
dc.subject
ZEA MAYS L.  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Crop nitrogen status of early- and late-sown maize at different plant densities  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-09-07T15:18:42Z  
dc.journal.volume
258  
dc.journal.pagination
1-10  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maltese, Nicolás Elías. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maddonni, Gustavo Angel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Melchiori, Ricardo José Miguel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Entre Ríos. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ferreyra, J. M.. Bayer Cropscience Sociedad Anonima; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Caviglia, Octavio Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Field Crops Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429020312491  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107965