Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Sample, Martha  
dc.contributor.author
Aslan, Clare E.  
dc.contributor.author
Policelli, Nahuel  
dc.contributor.author
Sanford, Robert L.  
dc.contributor.author
Nielsen, Erik  
dc.contributor.author
Nuñez, Martin Andres  
dc.date.available
2023-01-06T13:59:19Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Sample, Martha; Aslan, Clare E.; Policelli, Nahuel; Sanford, Robert L.; Nielsen, Erik; et al.; Increase in nonnative understorey vegetation cover after nonnative conifer removal and passive restoration; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Austral Ecology; 44; 8; 12-2019; 1384-1397  
dc.identifier.issn
1442-9985  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/183711  
dc.description.abstract
Nonnative conifers are widespread in the southern hemisphere, where their use as plantation species has led to adverse ecosystem impacts sometimes intensified by invasion. Mechanical removal is a common strategy used to reduce or eliminate the negative impacts of nonnative conifers, and encourage native regeneration. However, a variety of factors may preclude active ecological restoration following removal. As a result, passive restoration – unassisted natural vegetation regeneration – is common following conifer removal. We asked, ‘what is the response of understorey cover to removal of nonnative conifer stands followed by passive restoration?' We sampled understorey cover in three site types: two- to ten-year-old clearcuts, native forest and current plantations. We then grouped understorey species by origin (native/nonnative) and growth form, and compared proportion and per cent cover of these groups as well as of bare ground and litter between the three site types. For clearcuts, we also analysed the effect of time since clearcut on the studied variables. We found that clearcuts had a significantly higher average proportion of nonnative understorey vegetation cover than native forest sites, where nonnative vegetation was nearly absent. The understorey of clearcut sites also averaged more overall vegetation cover and more nonnative vegetation cover (in particular nonnative shrubs and herbaceous species) than either plantation or native forest sites. Notably, 99% of nonnative shrub cover in clearcuts was the invasive nonnative species Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius). After ten years of passive recovery since clearcutting, the proportion of understorey vegetation cover that is native has not increased and remains far below the proportion observed in native forest sites. Reduced natural regeneration capacity of the native ecosystem, presence of invasive species in the surrounding landscape and land-use legacies from plantation forestry may inhibit native vegetation recovery and benefit opportunistic invasives, limiting the effectiveness of passive restoration in this context. Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION  
dc.subject
NONNATIVE CONIFERS  
dc.subject
NONNATIVE SPECIES REMOVAL  
dc.subject
PATAGONIA  
dc.subject
SCOTCH BROOM  
dc.subject
VEGETATION REGENERATION  
dc.subject.classification
Ecología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Increase in nonnative understorey vegetation cover after nonnative conifer removal and passive restoration  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-01-06T09:28:58Z  
dc.journal.volume
44  
dc.journal.number
8  
dc.journal.pagination
1384-1397  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sample, Martha. Northern Arizona University.; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Aslan, Clare E.. Northern Arizona University.; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Policelli, Nahuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sanford, Robert L.. Northern Arizona University.; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nielsen, Erik. Northern Arizona University.; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nuñez, Martin Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Austral Ecology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.12812  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aec.12812