Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Piazza, María Victoria  
dc.contributor.author
Mazía, Cristina Noemí  
dc.contributor.author
Kitzberger, Thomas  
dc.contributor.author
Chaneton, Enrique Jose  
dc.date.available
2023-01-05T14:52:42Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Piazza, María Victoria; Mazía, Cristina Noemí; Kitzberger, Thomas; Chaneton, Enrique Jose; Chronic insect herbivores accelerate litter decomposition and nutrient recycling rates along an environmental/herbivory gradient in northern Patagonia; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 479; 118534; 1-2021; 1-10  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-1127  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/183532  
dc.description.abstract
Canopy insects are the main consumers in forests, and understanding their ecological role includes considering their effects on litter decomposition and nutrient cycling. We experimentally evaluated how litter decomposition is shaped by the decomposition environment and by litter traits shaped by forest moisture origin and chronic insect activity. We selected 4 forest stands at the driest and wettest extremes of beech (Nothofagus pumilio) forests in northwest Patagonia (mean annual rainfall 800 and 3000 mm yr−1 respectively). In two stands from each extreme, we performed three litterbag decomposition experiments. Experiment 1 included a reciprocal litter transplant between dry and wet stands, replicated in 2 different years for 24 and 12 months. Litterbags comprised the “Natural” proportion of undamaged and damaged leaves from the local insect community. Experiments 2 and 3 examined leaf insect damage effects on litter decomposition, respectively “in situ” and under controlled conditions. Here, we included three types of litterbags: 1- “Natural” (described above), 2- only insect-damaged litter, and 3- only healthy (undamaged) litter. Reciprocal transplants showed that litter decomposition was mostly controlled by litter origin and less by the decomposition environment (wet or dry forests). But, challenging predictions based on litter quality produced under water limiting environments, “Natural” litter chemical quality did not differ between forests. Even, when compared under the same decomposition environment (wet or dry forest), “Natural” litter from dry forests decomposed 31% faster and released 109% more N than “Natural” litter from wet forests. “Natural” litter from dry forests had a higher herbivory frequency and higher dominance of endophagous insects than wet stands. The high proportion of damaged litter in dry forests decreased “Natural” litter C:N ratio to match the chemical quality of “Natural” litter from wet forests. Experiment 2 showed that, in both wet and dry forests, damaged litter decomposed 31% faster than undamaged litter (in situ). Insect damage also reduced 90% N retention, but only in dry forests. Our results suggest that differences in insect communities living in contrasting environments could act as key drivers in shaping the recycling of organic matter, counteracting environmental differences between forests.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CHRONIC INSECT FOLIVORY  
dc.subject
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION  
dc.subject
FOREST MOISTURE  
dc.subject
NUTRIENT RECYCLING  
dc.subject
TEMPERATE FOREST  
dc.subject.classification
Ecología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Chronic insect herbivores accelerate litter decomposition and nutrient recycling rates along an environmental/herbivory gradient in northern Patagonia  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-10-06T13:09:57Z  
dc.journal.volume
479  
dc.journal.number
118534  
dc.journal.pagination
1-10  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Piazza, María Victoria. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Dasonomia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mazía, Cristina Noemí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomia. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Dasonomia; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kitzberger, Thomas. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. Laboratorio de Ecotono; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chaneton, Enrique Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Forest Ecology and Management  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118534  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112720313037