Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

PM10 emission from feedlots in soils with different texture: Cattle trampling effect

de Oro, Laura AndreaIcon ; Avecilla, FernandoIcon ; Panebianco, Juan EstebanIcon ; Buschiazzo, Daniel EduardoIcon
Fecha de publicación: 08/2021
Editorial: Elsevier
Revista: Aeolian Research
ISSN: 1875-9637
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Otras Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente

Resumen

Cattle feedlot surfaces can be an important aerosol source, but they have barely been studied. The action of the hooves on the loose, dry layer of soil and manure creates ideal conditions for particulate matter (PM) emissions. The objectives of this work were: a) to quantify the soil loss (Q) and the consequent emission of PM10 (FvPM10) from different surfaces within the feedlot: unpaved roads (UR), cropland (C) and cattle pen (CP); and b) to evaluate the cattle trampling effect in UR, C and CP on Q and FvPM10. The study was carried out in three feedlots with different soil textures: Trenel (FT), Santa Rosa (FSR) and General Acha (FGA). In a wind tunnel, erosion events were simulated at 10.5 m s−1 (µ*: 0.26 m s−1) during 5 min. The results showed that Q and FvPM10 were UR > C > CP and that the cattle trampling effect was generally directly proportional to Q and FvPM10 (p < 0.05). In general the emission efficiency (calculated as FvPM10/Q) was higher in the feedlot with the finest soil texture (FT) than in the other two feedlots with coarser soil (FSR and FGA). Regarding the type of surface, emission efficiency from UR was lower than from C and CP surfaces. CP presented the lowest values of Q and FvPM10, but it showed high RE so it could be considered a continuous source of wind derived emission of PM10 due to the effect of permanent trampling.
Palabras clave: CATTLE FEEDLOT , PM10 , TRAMPLING EFFECT , WIND EROSION
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 5.066Mb
Formato: PDF
.
Solicitar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/183414
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100742
Colecciones
Articulos(INCITAP)
Articulos de INST.D/CS D/L/TIERRA Y AMBIENTALES D/L/PAMPA
Citación
de Oro, Laura Andrea; Avecilla, Fernando; Panebianco, Juan Esteban; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; PM10 emission from feedlots in soils with different texture: Cattle trampling effect; Elsevier; Aeolian Research; 53; 8-2021; 1-10
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES