Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel
dc.contributor.author
Pascaner, Ariel Fernando
dc.contributor.author
Guilenea, Federico Nicolás
dc.contributor.author
Alcibar, J.
dc.contributor.author
Gencer, Umit
dc.contributor.author
Soulat, Gilles
dc.contributor.author
Mousseaux, Elie
dc.contributor.author
Craiem, Damian
dc.date.available
2022-12-14T13:59:40Z
dc.date.issued
2021-03
dc.identifier.citation
Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel; Pascaner, Ariel Fernando; Guilenea, Federico Nicolás; Alcibar, J.; Gencer, Umit; et al.; 4D flow MRI: impact of ROI size, angulation and spatial resolution on aortic flow assessment; IOP Publishing; Physiological Measurement; 42; 3; 3-2021; 1-12
dc.identifier.issn
0967-3334
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/181112
dc.description.abstract
Objectives. In cardiovascular magnetic resonance, the 3D time-resolved phase-contrast technique, also known as 4D flow, is gaining increasing attention due to applications that exploit three-directional velocity encoding throughout the cardiac cycle. Blood flow volume assessment usually requires an expert to draw regions of interest (ROI) around the vessel cross section, whereas the errors involved in this estimation have not been thoroughly investigated. Our objective is to quantify the influence of ROI sizing, angulation and spatial resolution of the reconstructed plane employed in blood flow measurements using 4D flow. Approach. Three circular ROIs were drawn around the ascending, arch and descending aorta of healthy volunteers (n = 27) and patients with a dilated ascending aorta or bicuspid valve (n = 37). We applied systematic changes of ROI diameter (up to ±10%), tilt angle (up to ±25°) and spatial resolution (from 0.25 to 2 mm) of the reconstructed oblique planes, calculating the effects on net, forward and backward blood flow volumes. Main results. Patients had a larger ascending aorta than healthy volunteers with similar ages and male sex proportion (60 ± 15 y.o. vs 58 ± 16 y.o. and 84% vs 70%, respectively). Higher forward and backward flow volumes were observed in the ascending aorta and the aortic arch of the patients with respect to controls (p < 0.001), whereas net volumes were similar: 74.0 ± 20.8 ml versus 75.7 ± 21.8 ml (p = 0.37), respectively. The ascending aorta was the most sensitive to ROI modifications. Changes of ±10% in the ROI diameter and ±25° in tilt angles produced flow volume differences of up to 9 ml (10%) and 18 ml (15%) in controls and patients, respectively. Modifying the reconstructed planes spatial resolution produced flow volume changes below 2 ml. Significance. Since the setting of the ROI size and plane angle could produce errors that represent up to 20% of the forward and/or backward aortic flow volume, a good standardization for vessel segmentation and plane positioning is desirable.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
IOP Publishing
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
AORTA
dc.subject
BLOOD FLOW MEASUREMENT
dc.subject
IMAGE PROCESSING
dc.subject
PHASE-CONTRAST MRI
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Médica
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Médica
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS
dc.title
4D flow MRI: impact of ROI size, angulation and spatial resolution on aortic flow assessment
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-09-22T00:44:51Z
dc.journal.volume
42
dc.journal.number
3
dc.journal.pagination
1-12
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pascaner, Ariel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Guilenea, Federico Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alcibar, J.. Universidad Favaloro. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gencer, Umit. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soulat, Gilles. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mousseaux, Elie. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Craiem, Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Physiological Measurement
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/abe525
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abe525
Archivos asociados