Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel  
dc.contributor.author
Pascaner, Ariel Fernando  
dc.contributor.author
Guilenea, Federico Nicolás  
dc.contributor.author
Alcibar, J.  
dc.contributor.author
Gencer, Umit  
dc.contributor.author
Soulat, Gilles  
dc.contributor.author
Mousseaux, Elie  
dc.contributor.author
Craiem, Damian  
dc.date.available
2022-12-14T13:59:40Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel; Pascaner, Ariel Fernando; Guilenea, Federico Nicolás; Alcibar, J.; Gencer, Umit; et al.; 4D flow MRI: impact of ROI size, angulation and spatial resolution on aortic flow assessment; IOP Publishing; Physiological Measurement; 42; 3; 3-2021; 1-12  
dc.identifier.issn
0967-3334  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/181112  
dc.description.abstract
Objectives. In cardiovascular magnetic resonance, the 3D time-resolved phase-contrast technique, also known as 4D flow, is gaining increasing attention due to applications that exploit three-directional velocity encoding throughout the cardiac cycle. Blood flow volume assessment usually requires an expert to draw regions of interest (ROI) around the vessel cross section, whereas the errors involved in this estimation have not been thoroughly investigated. Our objective is to quantify the influence of ROI sizing, angulation and spatial resolution of the reconstructed plane employed in blood flow measurements using 4D flow. Approach. Three circular ROIs were drawn around the ascending, arch and descending aorta of healthy volunteers (n = 27) and patients with a dilated ascending aorta or bicuspid valve (n = 37). We applied systematic changes of ROI diameter (up to ±10%), tilt angle (up to ±25°) and spatial resolution (from 0.25 to 2 mm) of the reconstructed oblique planes, calculating the effects on net, forward and backward blood flow volumes. Main results. Patients had a larger ascending aorta than healthy volunteers with similar ages and male sex proportion (60 ± 15 y.o. vs 58 ± 16 y.o. and 84% vs 70%, respectively). Higher forward and backward flow volumes were observed in the ascending aorta and the aortic arch of the patients with respect to controls (p < 0.001), whereas net volumes were similar: 74.0 ± 20.8 ml versus 75.7 ± 21.8 ml (p = 0.37), respectively. The ascending aorta was the most sensitive to ROI modifications. Changes of ±10% in the ROI diameter and ±25° in tilt angles produced flow volume differences of up to 9 ml (10%) and 18 ml (15%) in controls and patients, respectively. Modifying the reconstructed planes spatial resolution produced flow volume changes below 2 ml. Significance. Since the setting of the ROI size and plane angle could produce errors that represent up to 20% of the forward and/or backward aortic flow volume, a good standardization for vessel segmentation and plane positioning is desirable.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
IOP Publishing  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
AORTA  
dc.subject
BLOOD FLOW MEASUREMENT  
dc.subject
IMAGE PROCESSING  
dc.subject
PHASE-CONTRAST MRI  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Médica  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Médica  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
4D flow MRI: impact of ROI size, angulation and spatial resolution on aortic flow assessment  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-09-22T00:44:51Z  
dc.journal.volume
42  
dc.journal.number
3  
dc.journal.pagination
1-12  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Casciaro, Mariano Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pascaner, Ariel Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Guilenea, Federico Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alcibar, J.. Universidad Favaloro. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gencer, Umit. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soulat, Gilles. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mousseaux, Elie. Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou; Francia  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Craiem, Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Physiological Measurement  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/abe525  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abe525