Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Gattás, Florencia María  
dc.contributor.author
Espinosa, Mariela  
dc.contributor.author
Babay, Paola Alejandra  
dc.contributor.author
Pizarro, Haydee Norma  
dc.contributor.author
Cataldo, Daniel Hugo  
dc.date.available
2022-12-12T15:43:24Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-09  
dc.identifier.citation
Gattás, Florencia María; Espinosa, Mariela; Babay, Paola Alejandra; Pizarro, Haydee Norma; Cataldo, Daniel Hugo; Invasive species versus pollutants: Potential of Limnoperna fortunei to degrade glyphosate-based commercial formulations; Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science; Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety; 201; 9-2020; 1-9  
dc.identifier.issn
0147-6513  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/180773  
dc.description.abstract
The intensive use of glyphosate in industrial agriculture may lead to freshwater contamination, encouraging studies of its toxic effect on non-target aquatic organisms. Glyphosate-based commercial formulations contain adjuvants, making them even more toxic than the active ingredient (a.i.) itself. The golden mussel Limnoperna fortunei is a freshwater invasive species which has been found to increase glyphosate dissipation in water and to accelerate eutrophication. The aim of this study is to evaluate the capability of L. fortunei to reduce the concentration of glyphosate in two commercial formulations, Roundup Max® and Glifosato Atanor®. Results were compared with the decay of the a.i. alone and in presence of mussels. Evasive response and toxicity tests were performed in a first set of trials to analyze the response of L. fortunei exposed to Roundup Max® and Glifosato Atanor®. Subsequently, we conducted a 21-day degradation experiment in 2.6-L microcosms applying the following treatments: 6 mg L−1 of technical-grade glyphosate (G), Glifosato Atanor® (A), Roundup Max® (R), 20 mussels in dechlorinated tap water (M), and the combination of mussels and herbicide either in the technical-grade (MG) or formulated form (MA and MR) (all by triplicate). Samples were collected at days 0, 1, 7, 14 and 21. No significant differences in glyphosate decay were found between treatments with mussels (MG: 2.03 ± 0.40 mg L−1; MA: 1.60 ± 0.32 mg L−1; MR: 1.81 ± 0.21 mg L−1), between glyphosate as a.i. and the commercial formulations, and between the commercial formulations, suggesting that the adjuvants did not affect the degrading potential of L. fortunei. In addition to the acceleration of glyphosate dissipation in water, there was an increase in the concentration of dissolved nutrients in water (N–NH4 + and P-PO4 3-) even higher than that caused by the filtering activity of the mussels, probably resulting from stress or from the degradation of glyphosate and adjuvants. We believe that a larger bioavailability of these nutrients due to glyphosate metabolization mediated by mussels would accelerate eutrophication processes in natural water bodies. The approach used here, where L. fortunei was exposed to two commercial formulations actually used in agricultural practices, sheds light on the potential impact of glyphosate decay on water bodies invaded by this species.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
DEGRADATION  
dc.subject
FRESHWATER  
dc.subject
GLIFOSATO ATANOR®  
dc.subject
GLYPHOSATE  
dc.subject
LIMNOPERNA FORTUNEI  
dc.subject
ROUNDUP MAX®  
dc.subject.classification
Ecología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Invasive species versus pollutants: Potential of Limnoperna fortunei to degrade glyphosate-based commercial formulations  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2021-09-07T18:28:50Z  
dc.journal.volume
201  
dc.journal.pagination
1-9  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gattás, Florencia María. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Espinosa, Mariela. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Babay, Paola Alejandra. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pizarro, Haydee Norma. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cataldo, Daniel Hugo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0147651320306333  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110794