Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena  
dc.contributor.author
Cueto, Marcela Isabel  
dc.contributor.author
Gibbons, Alejandro Eduardo  
dc.contributor.author
Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
Catalano, Rodolfo César  
dc.contributor.author
Gonzalez Bulnes, Antonio  
dc.date.available
2022-12-07T12:59:45Z  
dc.date.issued
2014-05  
dc.identifier.citation
Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena; Cueto, Marcela Isabel; Gibbons, Alejandro Eduardo; Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto; Catalano, Rodolfo César; et al.; Repeatability of superovulatory response to successive FSH treatments in Merino sheep; Elsevier Science; Journal of Small Ruminant Research; 120; 1; 5-2014; 84-89  
dc.identifier.issn
0921-4488  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/180491  
dc.description.abstract
The efficiency of a multiple ovulation and embryo transfer program depends on the recovery of a large number of viable embryos per donor ewe at each successive superovulatory treatment. Embryo production, however, is characterized by high individual variability in the ovarian response to hormonal treatment. This study evaluated the repeatability of ovarian response and embryo recovery following three successive superovulatory treatments in 10 four-year-old Merino ewes over a short period of time. Oestrus was synchronized using an intravaginal progesterone pessary inserted on Day 0 and removed on Day 14. FSH was administered to induce superovulation in declining doses twice daily over 3 days as 2(18 + 14 + 8) = 80. mg total commencing on Day 12 after pessary insertion. A dose of 200. IU eCG was administered at pessary removal. Vasectomized rams were used for heat detection and laparoscopic AI was performed 12. h after oestrus detection. Surgical embryo recovery was performed at Day 8 after pessary removal, following which prostaglandin was administered and the next superovulatory procedures began 5 days later giving a 27-day interval between embryo recoveries. Ovulation rates (mean. ±. SEM) for the three successive superovulatory treatments were 13.8. ±. 2.2, 12.1. ±. 2.2 and 12.0. ±. 2.2 (NS); and total embryos recovered were 8.3. ±. 1.4, 6.3. ±. 1.4 and 3.9 ± 1.4 (P= 0.06), respectively. Consequently, the embryo recovery rates declined from 66.1. ±. 7.5% for the first recovery to 41.4. ±. 7.5 and 34.5. ±. 7.5% for the second and third recoveries (P= 0.04). The repeatability was r= 0.84 (P< 0.05) for ovulation rate, r= 0.13 (NS) for total number of embryos and r= 0.09 (NS) for number of grade 1 and 2 embryos. The study showed that an average of 16.3. ±. 2.6 grades 1 and 2 embryos per donor ewe could be recovered over a period of 2.5 months. The high repeatability of ovarian response to successive superovulatory treatments would have to be associated with a high level of repeatability for the number of transferable embryos recovered for it to be used as a criterion for selecting donors on the basis of their response to the first hormonal treatment.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
EMBRYO RECOVERY  
dc.subject
EMBRYO TRANSFER  
dc.subject
MULTIPLE OVULATION  
dc.subject
REPEATABILITY  
dc.subject
SHEEP  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Biotecnología Agropecuaria  
dc.subject.classification
Biotecnología Agropecuaria  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Repeatability of superovulatory response to successive FSH treatments in Merino sheep  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-12-06T17:12:24Z  
dc.journal.volume
120  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
84-89  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bruno Galarraga, María Macarena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cueto, Marcela Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gibbons, Alejandro Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pereyra Bonnet, Federico Alberto. Hospital Italiano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Catalano, Rodolfo César. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gonzalez Bulnes, Antonio. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Small Ruminant Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.04.002