Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Tozzi, María Verónica  
dc.date.available
2022-12-01T14:15:22Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Tozzi, María Verónica; Dewey, Mead, John Ford, and the writing of history: pragmatist contributions to narrativism; Associazione Pragma; European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy; 8; 2; 12-2016; 167-189  
dc.identifier.issn
2036-4091  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/179788  
dc.description.abstract
The second half of the twentieth century has been witness to a blooming of reflections on the status of historical narrative. One of the main achievements of a narrativist philosophy of history (NPH) consists of having reinforced the worth of an autonomous historical knowledge vis à vis standard conceptions of science which made history appear as underdeveloped. Although NPH does not dismiss the importance of documentary evidence, it did not produce an integrative account of both dimensions (the work of writing and the work with evidence), being slave of a number of epistemological dualism. On one hand, NPH seems to remain in the representationalist paradigm in the case of evidence, while, on the other hand, it only admits pragmatic evaluation in the case of narrative discourse. In this paper, I sustain that John Dewey’s and George H. Mead’s reflections on our knowledge of the past offer NPH good reasons to assess the role that literary theory can play in reconstructing historical controversies, without neglecting the importance of empirical research. For instance, Dewey holds that historical writing is a case of the judgments produced in response to problematic research situations. By virtue of this, the meaning of judgments referred to the past (that is, historical narrations) “have a future reference and function,” and thus understanding their meaning involves displaying the consequences that follow from such judgments. Mead, for his part, has argued that by appealing to the independent reality of the past as ground for our beliefs about it, rather than contributing to the rational resolution of our historical problems, we stray towards the search of something which is by definition unattainable. As a consequence, I shall show the urgency of advancing in the development of a narrativist, pragmatistically-informed philosophy of history. My considerations will be illustrated through the analysis of a controversial case about a past event: the main plot of the memorable film The man who shot Liberty Valance, by the equally memorable John Ford.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Associazione Pragma  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
NARRATIVE  
dc.subject
EVIDENCE  
dc.subject
QUESTION AND ANSWER LOGIC  
dc.subject
LITERARY THEORY  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Dewey, Mead, John Ford, and the writing of history: pragmatist contributions to narrativism  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-11-25T12:06:36Z  
dc.journal.volume
8  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
167-189  
dc.journal.pais
Italia  
dc.journal.ciudad
Roma  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/641  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.641