How the Type of Cosurfactant Impacts Strongly on the Size and Interfacial Composition in Gemini 12-2-12 RMs Explored by DLS, SLS, and FTIR Techniques

Abstract

The limited amount of information about reverse micelles (RMs) made with gemini surfactants, the effect of the n-alcohols in their interface, and the water-entrapped structure in the polar core motivated us to perform this work. Thus, in the present contribution, we use dynamic light scattering (DLS), static light scattering (SLS), and FT-IR techniques to obtain information on RMs structure created, with the gemini dimethylene-1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium) bromide (G12-2-12) surfactant and compare the results with its monomer: dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB). In this way, the size of the aggregates formed in different nonpolar organic solvents, the effect of the chain length of n-alcohols used as cosurfactants, and the water-entrapped structure were explored. The data show that the structure of the cosurfactant needed to stabilize the RMs plays a fundamental role, affecting the size and behavior of the aggregates. In contrast to what happens with the RMs formed with the monomer DTAB, water entrapped inside G12-2-12 RMs displays different interaction with the interface depending on the hydrocarbon chain length of the n-alcohol used as cosurfactant. Thus, n-pentanol and n-octanol molecules are located in different regions in the RMs interfaces formed with the gemini surfactant. n-Octanol locates at the RMs interface among the surfactant hydrocarbon tails increasing the water-surfactant polar headgroup interaction. On the other hand, n-pentanol locates at the RMs interface near the polar core, limiting the interaction of water with the micellar inner interface and favoring the water-water interaction in the polar core.