Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Gorosabel, Antonella  
dc.contributor.author
Pedrana, Julieta  
dc.contributor.author
Bernad, Lucia  
dc.contributor.author
Caballero, Veronica Jorgelina  
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz, S. D.  
dc.contributor.author
Maceira, Nestor Oscar  
dc.date.available
2022-11-18T19:38:31Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Gorosabel, Antonella; Pedrana, Julieta; Bernad, Lucia; Caballero, Veronica Jorgelina; Muñoz, S. D.; et al.; Evaluating the impacts and benefits of sheldgeese on crop yields in the Pampas region of Argentina: a contribution for mitigating the conflicts with agriculture; Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 279; 7-2019; 33-42  
dc.identifier.issn
0167-8809  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/178395  
dc.description.abstract
Conflicts between waterfowl and agriculture are common in many nations around the world. However, these birds can also provide a variety of benefits that humanity can obtain from nature. There are three migratory and endemic sheldgeese (Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps, Ashy-headed Goose Chloephaga poliocephala and Upland Goose Chloephaga picta) which are species of conservation concern in Argentina. Sheldgeese are in constant conflict with the agricultural practices in the Pampas region of Argentina. The objective was to measure possible damages and benefits due to geese grazing on winter wheat crops during different growth stages, in the southeast of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. We established a stratified random plot design in nine fields, where we placed geese exclosure plots and plots without exclosure, allowing sheldgeese to graze. From May to September, we visited each field every two weeks. We performed transects where we counted and collected feces in order to estimate the grazing intensity. We analyzed the total concentration of Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) in the feces in the period before and after the wheat emergence. We also performed microhistogical analysis to evaluate sheldgeese diet in these two periods. During the crop growth and at harvest, we evaluated possible damages (wheat cover, percentage of eaten plants, percentage of eaten tillers, chlorophyll content, grain yield per plot, harvest index, weight of 1000 grains) and benefits (number of tillers per plant, percentage of weed cover, protein content) of geese grazing. We found that sheldgeese grazing varied along the different visits and among the experimental fields. Geese grazing negatively affected the wheat cover but there was no effect on the final yield. The input of nutrients provided by sheldgeese feces was higher in the period after the crop emergence, when they only ate wheat. Results on the birds’ diet showed that they fed on weeds before wheat emergence thus providing an ecosystem service. In this study, we found elements that could help to shed light on the real impact of sheldgeese in crops and discovered some benefits that these birds could be providing to crops in the Pampas ecoregion.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BENEFITS  
dc.subject
CHLOEPHAGA SPP. SOUTHERN PAMPAS  
dc.subject
CONFLICT  
dc.subject
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES  
dc.subject
HUMAN-SHELDGEESE  
dc.subject
WHEAT DAMAGE  
dc.subject.classification
Conservación de la Biodiversidad  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Evaluating the impacts and benefits of sheldgeese on crop yields in the Pampas region of Argentina: a contribution for mitigating the conflicts with agriculture  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-11-17T17:34:08Z  
dc.journal.volume
279  
dc.journal.pagination
33-42  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gorosabel, Antonella. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pedrana, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bernad, Lucia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Caballero, Veronica Jorgelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Muñoz, S. D.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maceira, Nestor Oscar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880919300891  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.002