Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Gavin, Jones M.
dc.contributor.author
Brosi, Berry
dc.contributor.author
Evans, Jason
dc.contributor.author
Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.
dc.contributor.author
Loy, Xingwen
dc.contributor.author
Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Ober, Holly K.
dc.contributor.author
Pienaar, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author
Pillay, Rajeev
dc.contributor.author
Pisarello, Kathryn
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Lora L.
dc.contributor.author
Fletcher, Robert J.
dc.date.available
2022-10-17T18:21:26Z
dc.date.issued
2021-12-02
dc.identifier.citation
Gavin, Jones M.; Brosi, Berry; Evans, Jason; Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.; Loy, Xingwen; et al.; Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Conservation Biology; 36; 3; 2-12-2021; 1-15
dc.identifier.issn
0888-8892
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/173593
dc.description.abstract
International demand for wood and other forest products continues to grow rapidly, and uncertainties remain about how animal communities will respond to intensifying resource extraction associated with woody bioenergy production. We examined changes in alpha and beta diversity of bats, bees, birds, and reptiles across wood production landscapes in the southeastern United States, a biodiversity hotspot that is one of the principal sources of woody biomass globally. We sampled across a spatial gradient of paired forest land-uses (representing pre and postharvest) that allowed us to evaluate biological community changes resulting from several types of biomass harvest. Short-rotation practices and residue removal following clearcuts were associated with reduced alpha diversity (−14.1 and −13.9 species, respectively) and lower beta diversity (i.e., Jaccard dissimilarity) between land-use pairs (0.46 and 0.50, respectively), whereas midrotation thinning increased alpha (+3.5 species) and beta diversity (0.59). Over the course of a stand rotation in a single location, biomass harvesting generally led to less biodiversity. Cross-taxa responses to resource extraction were poorly predicted by alpha diversity: correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were highly variable (−0.2 to 0.4) with large uncertainties. In contrast, beta diversity patterns were highly consistent and predictable across taxa, where correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were all positive (0.05–0.4) with more narrow uncertainties. Beta diversity may, therefore, be a more reliable and information-rich indicator than alpha diversity in understanding animal community response to landscape change. Patterns in beta diversity were primarily driven by turnover instead of species loss or gain, indicating that wood extraction generates habitats that support different biological communities.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
dc.subject
BIODIVERSITY
dc.subject
BIOENERGY
dc.subject
BIOMASS
dc.subject
COMMUNITY
dc.subject
MULTISPECIES
dc.subject
OCCUPANCY MODELING
dc.subject
RESOURCE EXTRACTION
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Medioambientales
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-09-20T11:04:24Z
dc.journal.volume
36
dc.journal.number
3
dc.journal.pagination
1-15
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gavin, Jones M.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos. USDA Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Research Station; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Brosi, Berry. University of Washington; Estados Unidos. University of Emory; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Evans, Jason. Stetson University. Department of Environmental Science and Studies; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.. University of Florida; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Loy, Xingwen. University of Emory; Estados Unidos. Atlanta Botanical Garden. Conservation & Research Department; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Museo de Ciencias Naturales. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. University of Florida; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ober, Holly K.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pienaar, Elizabeth. University of Georgia; Estados Unidos. University of Pretoria. Mammal Research Institute; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pillay, Rajeev. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pisarello, Kathryn. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Smith, Lora L.. Jones Center at Ichauway; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fletcher, Robert J.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos
dc.journal.title
Conservation Biology
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.13872
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13872
Archivos asociados