Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Gavin, Jones M.  
dc.contributor.author
Brosi, Berry  
dc.contributor.author
Evans, Jason  
dc.contributor.author
Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.  
dc.contributor.author
Loy, Xingwen  
dc.contributor.author
Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio Manuel  
dc.contributor.author
Ober, Holly K.  
dc.contributor.author
Pienaar, Elizabeth  
dc.contributor.author
Pillay, Rajeev  
dc.contributor.author
Pisarello, Kathryn  
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Lora L.  
dc.contributor.author
Fletcher, Robert J.  
dc.date.available
2022-10-17T18:21:26Z  
dc.date.issued
2021-12-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Gavin, Jones M.; Brosi, Berry; Evans, Jason; Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.; Loy, Xingwen; et al.; Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Conservation Biology; 36; 3; 2-12-2021; 1-15  
dc.identifier.issn
0888-8892  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/173593  
dc.description.abstract
International demand for wood and other forest products continues to grow rapidly, and uncertainties remain about how animal communities will respond to intensifying resource extraction associated with woody bioenergy production. We examined changes in alpha and beta diversity of bats, bees, birds, and reptiles across wood production landscapes in the southeastern United States, a biodiversity hotspot that is one of the principal sources of woody biomass globally. We sampled across a spatial gradient of paired forest land-uses (representing pre and postharvest) that allowed us to evaluate biological community changes resulting from several types of biomass harvest. Short-rotation practices and residue removal following clearcuts were associated with reduced alpha diversity (−14.1 and −13.9 species, respectively) and lower beta diversity (i.e., Jaccard dissimilarity) between land-use pairs (0.46 and 0.50, respectively), whereas midrotation thinning increased alpha (+3.5 species) and beta diversity (0.59). Over the course of a stand rotation in a single location, biomass harvesting generally led to less biodiversity. Cross-taxa responses to resource extraction were poorly predicted by alpha diversity: correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were highly variable (−0.2 to 0.4) with large uncertainties. In contrast, beta diversity patterns were highly consistent and predictable across taxa, where correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were all positive (0.05–0.4) with more narrow uncertainties. Beta diversity may, therefore, be a more reliable and information-rich indicator than alpha diversity in understanding animal community response to landscape change. Patterns in beta diversity were primarily driven by turnover instead of species loss or gain, indicating that wood extraction generates habitats that support different biological communities.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY  
dc.subject
BIODIVERSITY  
dc.subject
BIOENERGY  
dc.subject
BIOMASS  
dc.subject
COMMUNITY  
dc.subject
MULTISPECIES  
dc.subject
OCCUPANCY MODELING  
dc.subject
RESOURCE EXTRACTION  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Medioambientales  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-09-20T11:04:24Z  
dc.journal.volume
36  
dc.journal.number
3  
dc.journal.pagination
1-15  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gavin, Jones M.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos. USDA Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Research Station; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Brosi, Berry. University of Washington; Estados Unidos. University of Emory; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Evans, Jason. Stetson University. Department of Environmental Science and Studies; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gottlieb, Isabel G. W.. University of Florida; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Loy, Xingwen. University of Emory; Estados Unidos. Atlanta Botanical Garden. Conservation & Research Department; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Museo de Ciencias Naturales. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. University of Florida; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ober, Holly K.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pienaar, Elizabeth. University of Georgia; Estados Unidos. University of Pretoria. Mammal Research Institute; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pillay, Rajeev. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pisarello, Kathryn. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Smith, Lora L.. Jones Center at Ichauway; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fletcher, Robert J.. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Conservation Biology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.13872  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13872