Artículo

Disagreement About Scientific Ontology

Borge, Bruno JoséIcon
Fecha de publicación: 02/2020
Editorial: Springer
Revista: Journal for General Philosophy of Science
ISSN: 0925-4560
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:

Resumen

In this paper, I analyze some disagreements about scientific ontology as cases of disagreement between epistemic peers. I maintain that the particularities of these cases are better understood if epistemic peerhood is relativized to a perspective-like index of epistemic goals and values. Taking the debate on the metaphysics of laws of nature as a case study, I explore the limits and possibilities of a trans-perspective assessment of positions regarding scientific ontology.
Palabras clave: LAWS OF NATURE , METAPHYSICS OF SCIENCE , PEER DISAGREEMENT , SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 613.6Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/171900
URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10838-020-09542-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09542-2
Colecciones
Articulos(SEDE CENTRAL)
Articulos de SEDE CENTRAL
Citación
Borge, Bruno José; Disagreement About Scientific Ontology; Springer; Journal for General Philosophy of Science; 2021; 2-2020; 1-17
Compartir
Altmétricas