Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Alejandrino, Clarisa
dc.contributor.author
Mercante, Irma Teresa
dc.contributor.author
Bovea, María D.
dc.date.available
2022-09-28T12:14:38Z
dc.date.issued
2021-03-17
dc.identifier.citation
Alejandrino, Clarisa; Mercante, Irma Teresa; Bovea, María D.; Life cycle sustainability assessment: Lessons learned from case studies; Elsevier; Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 87; 17-3-2021; 1-13
dc.identifier.issn
0195-9255
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/170727
dc.description.abstract
Although methodological development of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is still under discussion, an increasing number of case studies have been published in recent years. A necessity to strengthen methodological trade-offs and obtain a consistent basis for future LCSA case studies exists. The aim of this research is to identify how LCSA is being applied for each of the pillars of sustainability (environmental, economic and social) and how results are being integrated into the decision-making process. To achieve this aim, a systematic review of case studies was conducted. The methodology followed includes research questions to guide the process, search guidelines for selecting case studies to analyse and assessment rules to identify information to extract. The descriptive and content analyses of case studies provided key findings related to the main goals, divergences in the scope of the pillars of sustainability, data collection sources, the most readily applicable impact indicators for each of the three pillars of sustainability, operational research methods applied as drivers for communication and decision processes. In addition, the incipient interactions between LCSA and new sustainability approaches as circular economy and Sustainability Development Goals (SDG) is analysed. As a final conclusion, further research should be carried out to achieve consistency in the selection of the scope for each pillar of sustainability. This would make it possible to develop more accurate indicators for quantifying the social impact and to point out advantages and disadvantages of operation research methods for communication and support in decision-making.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
CIRCULAR ECONOMY
dc.subject
LCA
dc.subject
LCC
dc.subject
LCSA
dc.subject
REVIEW
dc.subject
SDG
dc.subject
SLCA
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS
dc.title
Life cycle sustainability assessment: Lessons learned from case studies
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-09-13T17:20:41Z
dc.journal.volume
87
dc.journal.pagination
1-13
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Alejandrino, Clarisa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mercante, Irma Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bovea, María D.. Universitat Jaume I; España
dc.journal.title
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925520307952
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106517
Archivos asociados