Artículo
Mistaken authority and obligation
Fecha de publicación:
23/03/2020
Editorial:
Cambridge University Press
Revista:
Legal Theory
ISSN:
1352-3252
e-ISSN:
1469-8048
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Massimo Renzo argues that, as long as it is acting in good faith, an authority can issue orders that require subjects to act in ways that are morally wrong and still be acting within the scope of its jurisdiction, so that the orders are binding. This, however, is incorrect. If the authority is permitted to issue an order, it is acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order creates an obligation. But if the authority is not permitted to issue the order, it is not acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order does not create any obligation whatsoever. I develop my position and provide a model of mistaken authority through engagement with Renzo's view.
Palabras clave:
AUTHORITY
,
CONTENT-INDEPEDENCE
,
JURISDICTION
,
JUST WAR THEORY
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(SEDE CENTRAL)
Articulos de SEDE CENTRAL
Articulos de SEDE CENTRAL
Citación
Venezia, Luciano Javier; Mistaken authority and obligation; Cambridge University Press; Legal Theory; 26; 4; 23-3-2020; 338-351
Compartir
Altmétricas