Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Torrents, Jorgelina
dc.contributor.author
Sarli, Macarena
dc.contributor.author
Rossner, Maria Victoria
dc.contributor.author
Toffaletti, José R.
dc.contributor.author
Morel, Facundo Nicolás
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Norberto C.
dc.contributor.author
Webster, Anelise
dc.contributor.author
Mangold, Atilio Jose
dc.contributor.author
Guglielmone, Alberto Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Nava, Santiago
dc.date.available
2022-09-23T17:58:03Z
dc.date.issued
2020-10
dc.identifier.citation
Torrents, Jorgelina; Sarli, Macarena; Rossner, Maria Victoria; Toffaletti, José R.; Morel, Facundo Nicolás; et al.; Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina; Elsevier; Research in Veterinary Science; 132; 10-2020; 332-337
dc.identifier.issn
0034-5288
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/170273
dc.description.abstract
Resistance to ivermectin in populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus in Argentina was diagnosed in this work. The in vitro larval immersion test (LIT) was used to determine quantitatively the levels of resistance to ivermectin in different populations of R. microplus. Additionally, field trials to control natural infestations of R. microplus on cattle with a commercial formulation of ivermectin 3.15% were carried and jointly analyzed with the in vitro assays. The phenotypic response of the populations analyzed was not uniform. Five of them were classified as susceptible, four populations as resistant, and one in the category “incipient resistance”. Regarding the field trials, the therapeutic efficacy in a population classified with LIT as susceptible achieved values higher than 94% two weeks after treatment, and no reproductively viable females were observed after the second day post-treatment. Conversely, the values of efficacy percentage in a population (named as “San Martín”) classified with LIT in the category “incipient resistance” never exceeded the 70.8%, and engorged females were collected in practically all counts. The population “San Martín” was classified in the category “incipient resistant” with LIT analysis, but the field trial unambiguously shows that this tick population is resistant. The comparison of the results obtained with LIT in vitro assays and through field trials shows that biased estimations of resistance levels may occur when resistance ratios (RR) values are ≤2, and additional field efficacy trials could be needed to know with precision the status of the tick populations evaluated.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
ARGENTINA
dc.subject
CATTLE TICK
dc.subject
CONTROL
dc.subject
IVERMECTIN
dc.subject
RESISTANCE
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-09-22T15:20:07Z
dc.journal.volume
132
dc.journal.pagination
332-337
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sarli, Macarena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rossner, Maria Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-Formosa. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Toffaletti, José R.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-formosa. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria El Colorado. Agencia de Extension Rural El Colorado.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Morel, Facundo Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez, Norberto C.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista. Agencia de Extension Rural Garabato.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Webster, Anelise. No especifíca;
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Guglielmone, Alberto Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Research in Veterinary Science
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034528820309255
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.07.012
Archivos asociados