Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Torrents, Jorgelina  
dc.contributor.author
Sarli, Macarena  
dc.contributor.author
Rossner, Maria Victoria  
dc.contributor.author
Toffaletti, José R.  
dc.contributor.author
Morel, Facundo Nicolás  
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Norberto C.  
dc.contributor.author
Webster, Anelise  
dc.contributor.author
Mangold, Atilio Jose  
dc.contributor.author
Guglielmone, Alberto Alejandro  
dc.contributor.author
Nava, Santiago  
dc.date.available
2022-09-23T17:58:03Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-10  
dc.identifier.citation
Torrents, Jorgelina; Sarli, Macarena; Rossner, Maria Victoria; Toffaletti, José R.; Morel, Facundo Nicolás; et al.; Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina; Elsevier; Research in Veterinary Science; 132; 10-2020; 332-337  
dc.identifier.issn
0034-5288  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/170273  
dc.description.abstract
Resistance to ivermectin in populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus in Argentina was diagnosed in this work. The in vitro larval immersion test (LIT) was used to determine quantitatively the levels of resistance to ivermectin in different populations of R. microplus. Additionally, field trials to control natural infestations of R. microplus on cattle with a commercial formulation of ivermectin 3.15% were carried and jointly analyzed with the in vitro assays. The phenotypic response of the populations analyzed was not uniform. Five of them were classified as susceptible, four populations as resistant, and one in the category “incipient resistance”. Regarding the field trials, the therapeutic efficacy in a population classified with LIT as susceptible achieved values higher than 94% two weeks after treatment, and no reproductively viable females were observed after the second day post-treatment. Conversely, the values of efficacy percentage in a population (named as “San Martín”) classified with LIT in the category “incipient resistance” never exceeded the 70.8%, and engorged females were collected in practically all counts. The population “San Martín” was classified in the category “incipient resistant” with LIT analysis, but the field trial unambiguously shows that this tick population is resistant. The comparison of the results obtained with LIT in vitro assays and through field trials shows that biased estimations of resistance levels may occur when resistance ratios (RR) values are ≤2, and additional field efficacy trials could be needed to know with precision the status of the tick populations evaluated.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ARGENTINA  
dc.subject
CATTLE TICK  
dc.subject
CONTROL  
dc.subject
IVERMECTIN  
dc.subject
RESISTANCE  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-09-22T15:20:07Z  
dc.journal.volume
132  
dc.journal.pagination
332-337  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Torrents, Jorgelina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sarli, Macarena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rossner, Maria Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-Formosa. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Toffaletti, José R.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-formosa. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria El Colorado. Agencia de Extension Rural El Colorado.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Morel, Facundo Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez, Norberto C.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria Reconquista. Agencia de Extension Rural Garabato.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Webster, Anelise. No especifíca;  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mangold, Atilio Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Guglielmone, Alberto Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nava, Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Research in Veterinary Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034528820309255  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.07.012