Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Novas, Mariano Axel  
dc.date.available
2022-09-12T13:42:51Z  
dc.date.issued
2020-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Novas, Mariano Axel; Antarctic governance of biological resources: the Argentine White Genome project; Taylor & Francis Ltd; The Polar Journal; 9; 2; 3-2020; 371-389  
dc.identifier.issn
2154-896X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/168314  
dc.description.abstract
The purpose of the Antarctic Treaty is to ensure the peaceful use and demilitarisation of the vast Antarctic continent, as well as the corresponding suspension of territorial claims in the region. Aside from managing relations among individual states, the Treaty also encourages scientific collaboration and requires certain kinds of information exchange with a view to reducing the potential for conflicts. A challenge has arisen, however, since the turn of this century, with the increasing search, collection, study, and possible industrial application of biological resources, called bioprospecting. This has become one of the most debated topics at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. Although bioprospecting is a scientific activity with peaceful and commercial aims, it nonetheless generates disagreements and controversy among participating states across a range of issues, including the access and ownership of genetic resources, scientific information exchange, environmental impact, and the resulting distribution of monetary benefits among actors. This uncertainty leads to the question: can bioprospecting projects be adapted to the principles of Antarctic governance? This study aims to answer that question through an analysis of the ‘Genoma Blanco’ (White Genome) project supported by the Argentine government some years ago. Argentina’s approach to the project combined adherence to national sovereignty principles and compliance with Antarctic governance requirements, thus constituting a singular case within the context of legal ambiguity in which the Treaty still navigates in relation to bioprospecting activities. On the one hand, Argentina supported policies of transparency, providing information about Genoma Blanco activities and discoveries to other Treaty members. On the other hand, it maintained its principles of sovereignty by asserting ownership over resources found and by using research findings as part of its strategic discourse tools towards legitimising Argentina’s permanence in the sector under its own sovereignty claims.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ANTARCTIC GOVERNANCE  
dc.subject
ANTARCTIC TREATY SYSTEM  
dc.subject
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES  
dc.subject
BIOPROSPECTION  
dc.subject
SOVEREIGNTY  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Antarctic governance of biological resources: the Argentine White Genome project  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-09-09T18:01:51Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
2154-8978  
dc.journal.volume
9  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
371-389  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
London  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Novas, Mariano Axel. Universidad Nacional de San Martín; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
The Polar Journal  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2154896X.2019.1685172  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2019.1685172