Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
dc.contributor.author
Buchanan, Allen
dc.contributor.author
Chan, Shuk Ying
dc.contributor.author
Fabre, Cécile
dc.contributor.author
Halliday, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Leland, R. J.
dc.contributor.author
Luna, Florencia
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.contributor.author
Mccoy, Matthew S.
dc.contributor.author
Norheim, Ole F.
dc.contributor.author
Schaefer, G. Owen
dc.contributor.author
Tan, Kok Chor
dc.contributor.author
Wellman, Christopher Heath
dc.date.available
2022-09-01T15:11:36Z
dc.date.issued
2021-10
dc.identifier.citation
Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Buchanan, Allen; Chan, Shuk Ying; Fabre, Cécile; Halliday, Daniel; et al.; On the Ethics of Vaccine Nationalism: The Case for the Fair Priority for Residents Framework; Cambridge University Press; Ethics and International Affairs; 35; 4; 10-2021; 543-562
dc.identifier.issn
0892-6794
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/167184
dc.description.abstract
COVID-19 vaccines are likely to be scarce for years to come. Many countries, from India to the U.K., have demonstrated vaccine nationalism. What are the ethical limits to this vaccine nationalism? Neither extreme nationalism nor extreme cosmopolitanism is ethically justifiable. Instead, we propose the fair priority for residents (FPR) framework, in which governments can retain COVID-19 vaccine doses for their residents only to the extent that they are needed to maintain a noncrisis level of mortality while they are implementing reasonable public health interventions. Practically, a noncrisis level of mortality is that experienced during a bad influenza season, which society considers an acceptable background risk. Governments take action to limit mortality from influenza, but there is no emergency that includes severe lockdowns. This flu-risk standard is a nonarbitrary and generally accepted heuristic. Mortality above the flu-risk standard justifies greater governmental interventions, including retaining vaccines for a country´s own citizens over global need. The precise level of vaccination needed to meet the flu-risk standard will depend upon empirical factors related to the pandemic. This links the ethical principles to the scientific data emerging from the emergency. Thus, the FPR framework recognizes that governments should prioritize procuring vaccines for their country when doing so is necessary to reduce mortality to noncrisis flu-like levels. But after that, a government is obligated to do its part to share vaccines to reduce risks of mortality for people in other countries. We consider and reject objections to the FPR framework based on a country: (1) having developed a vaccine, (2) raising taxes to pay for vaccine research and purchase, (3) wanting to eliminate economic and social burdens, and (4) being ineffective in combating COVID-19 through public health interventions.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
COSMOPOLITANISM
dc.subject
COVID-19
dc.subject
FAIR PRIORITY
dc.subject
MORTALITY
dc.subject
NATIONALISM
dc.subject
VACCINES
dc.subject.classification
Ética
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
On the Ethics of Vaccine Nationalism: The Case for the Fair Priority for Residents Framework
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-08-24T19:16:34Z
dc.identifier.eissn
1747-7093
dc.journal.volume
35
dc.journal.number
4
dc.journal.pagination
543-562
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.description.fil
Fil: Emanuel, Ezekiel J.. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Buchanan, Allen. University of Arizona; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chan, Shuk Ying. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fabre, Cécile. All Souls College; Reino Unido
dc.description.fil
Fil: Halliday, Daniel. University of Melbourne; Australia
dc.description.fil
Fil: Leland, R. J.. University of Manitoba; Canadá
dc.description.fil
Fil: Luna, Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mccoy, Matthew S.. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Norheim, Ole F.. University of Bergen; Noruega
dc.description.fil
Fil: Schaefer, G. Owen. Nus Yong Loo Lin School Of Medicine; Singapur
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tan, Kok Chor. University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Wellman, Christopher Heath. Washington University in St. Louis; Estados Unidos
dc.journal.title
Ethics and International Affairs
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000514
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/abs/on-the-ethics-of-vaccine-nationalism-the-case-for-the-fair-priority-for-residents-framework/9EDCDA405B36826BEA5E3FE449810A7C
Archivos asociados