Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
de Fazio, Federico Leandro
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2022-08-30T13:36:52Z
dc.date.issued
2021-06
dc.identifier.citation
de Fazio, Federico Leandro; Proportionality test and constitutional social rights; Franz Steiner Verlag; Archiv Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie (arsp); 107; 2; 6-2021; 219-234
dc.identifier.issn
0001-2343
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166921
dc.description.abstract
The purpose of this article is to make a rational reconstruction of the use of the proportionality test in contexts of judicial adjudication of constitutional social rights. This reconstruction will be developed in two stages. Firstly, I will deal with the question of whether the proportionality test in its variation by omission (that is, in cases of positive rights) exhibits or not a different structure with respect to its (better known and developed) variation by excess (that is, in cases of negative rights). Secondly, I will describe the rules and forms of argumentation implied in the use of the proportionality test by omission, which constitute its respective sub-tests of suitability, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu. Lastly, I will present a brief summary.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Franz Steiner Verlag
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BALANCING
dc.subject
CONSTITUTIONAL SOCIAL RIGHTS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL ADJUDICATION
dc.subject
NECESSITY
dc.subject
PROPORTIONALITY TEST
dc.subject
STRUCTURAL IDENTITY THESIS
dc.subject
SUITABILITY
dc.subject.classification
Otras Derecho
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Derecho
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Proportionality test and constitutional social rights
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-08-16T12:03:55Z
dc.journal.volume
107
dc.journal.number
2
dc.journal.pagination
219-234
dc.journal.pais
Alemania
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Stuttgart
dc.description.fil
Fil: de Fazio, Federico Leandro. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales "Dr. Ambrosio L. Gioja"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Archiv Fur Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie (arsp)
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2021-0012
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://elibrary.steiner-verlag.de/article/10.25162/arsp-2021-0012
Archivos asociados