Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Bianchini, Alahi Dana
dc.contributor.author
Mastroleo, Ignacio Damian
dc.date.available
2022-08-29T14:10:06Z
dc.date.issued
2021-01
dc.identifier.citation
Bianchini, Alahi Dana; Mastroleo, Ignacio Damian; Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy; Journal of Science Humanities and Arts; Journal of Science Humanities and Arts; 8; 1; 1-2021; 1-12
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/166813
dc.description.abstract
The biomedical sciences need philosophy on at least two levels. Firstly, we can find strong arguments that recognize the need for philosophy on a theoretical level, such as the development of scientific theories that in turn can have effects such as the development of new treatments or other medical interventions. However, philosophy, and particularly bioethics, is necessary for the biomedical sciences at the practical level, that is, in the daily practice of science and the achievement of its goals and results. In this work, we will reconstruct some of the arguments that point out the importance of philosophy for science on a theoretical level, and, furthermore, we will argue that these same conceptual tools of philosophy can be useful on a practical level of biomedical sciences too. To this end, we will present four cases from the conceptual research conducted by the BioThera Institute of Philosophy: the enhanced definition of medical innovation as a new non-validated practice, the ethical justification of the duty of States to promote clinical research, the fair play model for the distribution of fair benefits in clinical research, and the ethical model for allocation of extremely scarce resources in times of public health emergency.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Journal of Science Humanities and Arts
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
METAPHILOSOPHY
dc.subject
SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY INTEGRATION
dc.subject
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
dc.subject
ETHICS
dc.subject.classification
Otras Filosofía, Étnica y Religión
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
dc.title
Why the biomedical Sciences need Philosophy: theoretical and practical Reasons illustrated with examples from the BioThera Institute of Philosophy
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-08-24T19:17:29Z
dc.identifier.eissn
2364-0626
dc.journal.volume
8
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
1-12
dc.journal.pais
Alemania
dc.journal.ciudad
Freiburg
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bianchini, Alahi Dana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Mastroleo, Ignacio Damian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal of Science Humanities and Arts
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://josha-journal.org/en/categories/humanities-social-sciences-and-law/articles/why-the-biomedical-sciences-need-philosophy-theoretical-and-practical-reasons-illustrated-with-examples-from-the-biothera-institute-of-philosophy
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.17160/josha.8.1.728
Archivos asociados